VoxJuris
Home › Acts › Constitution › Part VI › Article 230

Constitution of India · Part VI: The States · Application of certain provisions relating to Supreme Court

Article 230: Extension of jurisdiction of High Courts to Union territories

In plain words

Parliament can by law extend a High Court's jurisdiction to a Union territory, or exclude it. Where a State's High Court has jurisdiction over a Union territory, the State Legislature cannot change that jurisdiction, and the President takes the Governor's place under article 227 for subordinate courts there.

A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.

Official text

(1) Parliament may by law extend the jurisdiction of a High Court to, or exclude the jurisdiction of a High Court from, any Union territory.

(2) Where the High Court of a State exercises jurisdiction in relation to a Union territory,—

(a) nothing in this Constitution shall be construed as empowering the Legislature of the State to increase, restrict or abolish that jurisdiction; and

(b) the reference in article 227 to the Governor shall, in relation to any rules, forms or tables for subordinate courts in that territory, be construed as a reference to the President.

Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.

Supreme Court judgments citing the article 230