Constitution of India · Part VI: The States · Application of certain provisions relating to Supreme Court
Article 222: Transfer of a Judge from one High Court to another
In plain words
The President can transfer a Judge from one High Court to another. A transferred Judge receives a compensatory allowance in addition to salary, as Parliament decides by law or, until then, as the President fixes by order.
- The printed text refers to recommendation by the National Judicial Appointments Commission. The amendment that inserted that wording was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) The President may, [on the recommendation of the National Judicial Appointments Commission referred to in article 124A], transfer a Judge from one High Court to any other High Court ***. [(2) When a Judge has been or is so transferred, he shall, during the period he serves, after the commencement of the Constitution (Fifteenth Amendment) Act, 1963, as a Judge of the other High Court, be entitled to receive in addition to his salary such compensatory allowance as may be determined by Parliament by law and, until so determined, such compensatory allowance as the President may by order fix.]
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 222
-
Dr Kavita Kamboj v. High Court of Punjab and Haryana & Ors
The issue for consideration was a challenge to a decision of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana directing the State of Haryana to take positive action to accept its recommendation vide communication dated 23.02.2023,…
- Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India
- Dr. Jaishri Laxmanrao Patil v. The Chief Minister & Ors.
- Lok Prahari Through Its General Secretary S.N. Shukla Ias (Retd.) v. Union of India & Ors.
- Dheeraj Mor v. Hon’Ble High Court of Delhi
- Shanti Bhushan v. Supreme Court of India Through Its Registrar and Another
- Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Another v. Union of India
- Madras Bar Association v. Union of India and Another
- Dr. Ram Tawakya Singh v. State of Bihar and Others
- Mr. Justice Chandrashekaraiah (Retd.) v. Janekere C. Krishna & Ors. Etc.
- Re: Special Reference N0.1 of 2012 v. --
- State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal & Others
- N. Kannadasan v. Ajoy Khose and Others
- Jamshed N. Guzdar v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- Special Reference No. I of 1998 v. -----
- K. Ashok Reddy Etc. v. The Government of India and Ors.
- Union of India v. Justice S.S. Sandhawalia (Retd.) and Vice Versa
- Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. v. Union of India
- K. Veeraswami v. Union of India and Others
- M.L. Jain v. Union of India
- S.P. Gupta & Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Union of India & Ors. Etc. Etc.
- V.B. Raju v. State of Gujarat & Anr
- Union of India v. Shri Gopal Chandra Misra and Ors.
- Union of India v. Sankal Chand Himatlal Sheth and Anr.
- Krishan Gopal v. Shri Prakash Chandra & Ors.
- Prem Nath & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.