Constitution of India · Part VI: The States · Application of certain provisions relating to Supreme Court
Article 228: Transfer of certain cases to High Court
In plain words
If a High Court is satisfied that a case pending in a lower court involves a substantial question of law on interpreting the Constitution that must be decided to dispose of the case, it must withdraw the case. It can then decide the whole case itself, or decide the question and send the case back for the lower court to decide in line with its judgment.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
If the High Court is satisfied that a case pending in a court subordinate to it involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of this Constitution the determination of which is necessary for the disposal of the case, [it shall withdraw the case and
*** may—]
(a) either dispose of the case itself, or
(b) determine the said question of law and return the case to the court from which the case has been so withdrawn together with a copy of its judgment on such question, and the said court shall on receipt thereof proceed to dispose of the case in conformity with such judgment. withdraw the case and may—" (w.e.f. 1-2-1977).
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the official text of the Constitution of India. As amended up to the Constitution (One Hundred and Sixth Amendment) Act, 2023. Text as on 10 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the article 228
- Air India Cabin Crew Assn. v. Yeshaswinee Merchant
- Shah Newaz Khan v. State of Nagaland
- Joseph Shine v. Union of India
- Arun Dev Upadhyaya v. Integrated Sales Service Ltd & Anr.
- State of Gujarat and Anr. v. Gujarat Revenue Tribunal Bar Association and Anr.
- Columbia Sportswear Company v. Director of Income Tax, Bangalore
- S.D. Joshi & Ors. v. High Court of Judicature at Bombay & Ors.
- Shalini Shyam Shetty and Another v. Rajendra Shankar Patil
- State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Samar Kumar Sarkar
- State of Rajasthan v. Prakash Chand and Ors.
- Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Pravinbhai Jasbhai Patel and Ors.
- Canara Bank v. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. and Ors.
- A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak & Anr.
- Umaji Keshao Meshram & Ors. v. Radhikabai W/O Anandrao Banapurkar & Anr.
- Union of India v. City Municipal Council, Bellary
- Nasiruddin v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal
- N. S. Gujral v. Custodian of Evacuee Property & Anr.
- Thakur Jugal Kishore Sinha v. Sitamarhi Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd. & Anr.
- State of Rajasthan v. Mukanchand and Others
- M/S. Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Shyam Sundar Jhunjhunwala and Others
- Dr. Jatish Chandra Ghosh v. Hari Sadhan Mukherjee and Others.
- Mahant Moti Das v. S. P. Sahi, the Special Officer in Charge of Hindu Religious Trusts & Others
- Raja Ganga Pratap Singh v. The Allahabad Bank Ltd., Lucknow
- Rao Shiva Bahadur Singh v. The State of Vindhya Pradesh and Another
- The State of West Bengal v. Subodh Gopalbose and Others
- The State of West Bengal v. Mrs. Bela Banerjee and Others
- Maqbool Hussain v. The State of Bombay
- Lachmandas Kew Alram Ahuja and Another v. The State of Bombay
- Gurbachan Singh v. The State of Bombay and Another
- Keshavan Madhava Menon v. The State of Bombay