Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXIV: General Provisions As to Inquiries and Trials
Section 320: Compounding of offences
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
(1) The offences punishable under the sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) specified in the first two columns of the Table next following may be compounded by the persons mentioned in the third column of that Table:— [TABLE Offence Section of the Person by whom offence Indian Penal may be compounded Code applicable
Uttering words, etc., with deliberate
The person whose religious feelings intent to wound the religious are intended to be wounded. feelings of any person. Voluntarily causing hurt.
The person to whom the hurt is caused. Voluntarily causing hurt on
Ditto. provocation. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt
The person to whom the hurt is on grave and sudden provocation. caused. Wrongfully restraining or confining 341, The person restrained or confined. any person.
Wrongfully confining a person for
The person confined. three days or more Wrongfully confining a person for
Ditto. ten days or more. 1. Subs. by Act 5 of 2009, s. 23, for the TABLE (w.e.f. 31-12-2009).
Wrongfully confining a person in The person confined. secret. Assault or use of criminal force. 352, The person assaulted or to whom 355, criminal force is used.
Theft.
The owner of the property stolen. Dishonest misappropriation of
The owner of the property property. misappropriated. Criminal breach of trust by a carrier,
The owner of the property in respect wharfinger, etc. of which the breach of trust has been committed. Dishonestly receiving stolen
The owner of the property stolen. property knowing it to be stolen. Assisting in the concealment or
Ditto. disposal of stolen property, knowing it to be stolen. Cheating.
The person cheated. Cheating by personation.
Ditto. Fraudulent removal or concealment
The creditors who are affected of property, etc., to prevent thereby. distribution among creditors. Fraudulently preventing from being
Ditto. made available for his creditors a debt or demand due to the offender. Fraudulent execution of deed of
The person affected thereby. transfer containing false statement of consideration. Fraudulent removal or concealment
Ditto. of property. Mischief, when the only loss or 426, The person to whom the loss or damage caused is loss or damage to
damage is caused. a private person. Mischief by killing or maiming
The owner of the animal. animal. Mischief by killing or maiming
The owner of the cattle or animal. cattle, etc. Mischief by injury to works of
The person to whom the loss or irrigation by wrongfully diverting damage is caused. water when the only loss or damage caused is loss or damage to private person.
Criminal trespass.
The person in possession of the property trespassed upon. House-trespass.
Ditto. House-trespass to commit an
The person in possession of the offence (other than theft) punishable house trespassed upon. with imprisonment. Using a false trade or property
The person to whom loss or injury is mark. caused by such use. Counterfeiting a trade or property
Ditto. mark used by another. Knowingly selling, or exposing or
Ditto. possessing for sale or for manufacturing purpose, goods marked with a counterfeit property mark. Criminal breach of contract of
The person with whom the offender service. has contracted. Adultery.
The husband of the woman. Enticing or taking away or detaining
The husband of the woman and the with criminal intent a married woman woman. Defamation, except such cases as
The person defamed. are specified against section 500 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) in column 1 of the Table under sub-section (2). Printing or engraving matter,
Ditto. knowing it to be defamatory. Sale of printed or engraved
Ditto. substance containing defamatory matter, knowing it to contain such matter. Insult intended to provoke a breach
The person insulted. of the peace. Criminal intimidation.
The person intimidated. Inducing person to believe himself
The person induced.] an object of divine displeasure.
(2) The offences punishable under the sections of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) specified in the first two columns of the Table next following may, with the permission of the Court before which any prosecution for such offence is pending, be compounded by the persons mentioned in the third column of that Table:— [TABLE Offence Section of the Person by whom offence Indian Penal may be compounded Code applicable
Causing miscarriage.
The woman to whom miscarriage is caused . Voluntarily causing grievous hurt.
The person to whom hurt is caused. Causing hurt by doing an act so
Ditto. rashly and negligently as to endanger human life or the personal safety of others. Causing grievous hurt by doing an
Ditto. act so rashly and negligently as to endanger human life or the personal safety of others. Assault or criminal force in attempt-
The person assaulted or to whom ting wrongfully to confine a person. the force was used. Theft, by clerk or servant of
The owner of the property stolen. property in possession of master. Criminal breach of trust
The owner of property in respect of which breach of trust has been committed. Criminal breach of trust by a clerk
The owner of the property in respect or servant. of which the breach of trust has been committed. Cheating a person whose interest
The person cheated. the offender was bound, either by law or by legal contract, to protect. Cheating and dishonestly inducing
The person cheated. delivery of property or the making, alteration or destruction of a valuable security. Marrying again during the life-time
The husband or wife of the person so marrying. of a husband or wife. 1. Subs. by Act 5 of 2009, s. 23, for TABLE (w.e.f. 31-12-2009).
Defamation against the President or the 500 The person defamed. Vice-President or the Governor of a State or the Administrator of a Union territory or a Minister in respect of his public functions when instituted upon a complaint made by the Public Prosecutor. Uttering words or sounds or making
The woman whom it was intended to gestures or exhibiting any object insult or whose privacy was intruded intending to insult the modesty of a upon.] woman or intruding upon the privacy of a woman. [(3) When an offence is compoundable under this section, the abetment of such offence or an attempt to commit such offence (when such attempt is itself an offence) or where the accused is liable under section 34 or 149 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) may be compounded in like manner.]
(4) (a) When the person who would otherwise be competent to compound an offence under this section is under the age of eighteen years or is an idiot or a lunatic, any person competent to contract on his behalf may, with the permission of the Court, compound such offence.
(b) When the person who would otherwise be competent to compound an offence under this section is dead, the legal representative, as defined in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) of such person may, with the consent of the Court, compound such offence.
(5) When the accused has been committed for trial or when he has been convicted and an appeal is pending, no composition for the offence shall be allowed without the leave of the Court to which he is committed, or, as the case may be, before which the appeal is to be heard.
(6) A High Court or Court of Session acting in the exercise of its powers of revision under section 401 may allow any person to compound any offence which such person is competent to compound under this section.
(7) No offence shall be compounded if the accused is, by reason of a previous conviction, liable either to enhanced punishment or to a punishment of a different kind for such offence.
(8) The composition of an offence under this section shall have the effect of an acquittal of the accused with whom the offence has been compounded.
(9) No offence shall be compounded except as provided by this section.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 320
-
Sanjabij Tari v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr.
The present appeal has been filed challenging the ex-parte judgment and order dated 16.04.2009 passed by the High Court acquitting the respondent no.1-accused u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and…
-
Naushey Ali & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Whether the present case is a fit case where proceedings could be quashed, particularly when Section 307, IPC inter alia was invoked and there was a settlement between the parties.
-
Ajay Malik v. State of Uttarakhand & Anr.
(1) Whether the High Court acted well within the contours of its powers under Section 482 of the CrPC in rejecting Ajay Malik’s quashing petition; (2) Whether the High Court fell in error in rejecting the Compounding…
-
K. Bharthi Devi and Anr. v. State of Telangana and Anr.
Despite the dispute involved having predominantly overtures of a civil dispute and the matter having been compromised between the parties, whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the quashing petition filed…
-
Suraj Singh Gujar & Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Appellants were convicted by the Trial Court u/ss.323, 324 and 325 r/w. s.34 of IPC. It is stated by the appellants that they have settled the dispute with the injured persons vide compromise deed dated 29.01.2024. In…
-
A.S. Pharma Pvt. Ltd. v. Nayati Medical Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
High Court whether justified in exercising its inherent power under Section 482, Cr.P.C and the power under Section 147, N.I. Act, 1881 to compound the offence u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, despite…
-
M/s New Win Export & Anr. v. A. Subramaniam
Whether in the instant case, conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 could be quashed by the Supreme Court as the parties had settled the dispute among themselves by entering into a…
-
Achin Gupta v. State of Haryana & Anr.
The appellant herein was chargesheeted u/ss.323, 406, 498A and 506 of IPC. The appellant filed a quashing petition for the purpose of getting the criminal proceedings quashed. The High Court by its impugned order,…
-
Raj Reddy Kallem v. The State of Haryana & Anr.
Appellant was convicted u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Additionally, an FIR was also filed against the appellant u/ ss.406, 420, 120B, IPC. Parties agreed to compound the offence at the appellate stage…
-
Mamidi Anil Kumar Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.
The High Court, if justified in refusing to quash the docket order which re-initiated criminal proceedings against the appellants for offences u/s. 420, 498A, 506 IPC and u/s. 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
- The State of Madhya Pradesh and Others v. Bhupendra Yadav
- Chanchalpati Das v. The State of West Bengal &
- Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan
- Daxaben v. The State of Gujarat & Ors.
- State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Chetan Jeff
- Ramawatar v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Jaswant Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- M/S Gimpex Private Limited v. Manoj Goel
- Ramgopal & Anr. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Bhagwan Narayan Gaikwad v. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited and Another v. Anil Kanwariya
- Salimbhai Hamidbhai Memon v. Niteshkumar Maganbhai Patel & Anr.
- The State of Kerala v. K. Ajith & Ors.
- Prakash Gupta v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
- Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra and Others
- P. Mohanraj & Ors. v. M/S. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.
- Pravat Chandra Mohanty v. The State of Odisha & Anr.
- Murali v. State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
- Commissioner (Ct) Ltu Kakinada & Ors. v. M/S. Glaxo Smith Kline Consumer Health Care Limited
- Arun Singh & Others v. State of U.P. Through Its Secretary & Another
- The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and Others
- The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar and Another
- State of Madhya Pradesh and Others v. Abhijit Singh Pawar
- Bannareddy & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Oil & Natural Gas Corp. Ltd. v. Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
- Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sadhu Ram Singla & Ors.
- Asha Ranjan v. State of Bihar & Ors.
- J. Ramesh Kamath & Ors. v. Mohana Kurup & Ors.
- State of M.P. v. Manish & Ors.
- Nanda Gopalan v. State of Kerala
- Ravinder Kaur v. Anil Kumar
- Madhya Pradesh State Legal Services Authority v. Prateek Jain & Anr.
- Gopakumar B. Nair v. C.B.I. & Anr.
- Narinder Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- Cbi, Acb, Mumbai v. Narendra Lal Jain & Ors.
- Manohar Lal Sharma v. The Principal Secretary and Ors.
- State of Rajasthan v. Shambhu Kewat and Another
- Central Bureau of Investigation v. Jagjit Singh
- Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. v. Babita Raghuvanshi & Anr.
- Geeta Mehrotra & Anr. v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & Another
- Jayrajsinh Digvijaysinh Rana v. State of Gujarat and Anr.
- Ashok Sadarangani & Anr. v. Union of !Noia & Ors.
- Jik Industries Limited & Ors. v. Amarlal v. Jumani and Another
- Gulab Das & Ors. v. State of M.P.
- Shiji @ Pappu and Ors. v. Radhika and Anr.
- Princl. Chief Conservator of Forest & Anr. v. J.K. Johnson & Ors.
- Sushil Suri v. C.B.I & Anr.
- Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr
- State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Arun Gulab Gawali & Ors.
- Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H.
- Hirabhai Jhaverbhai v. State of Gujarat & Ohs.