Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXIV: General Provisions As to Inquiries and Trials
Section 307: Power to direct tender of pardon
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
In plain words
After a case is committed and before judgment, the trial court can tender a pardon on the same condition to a person involved in or aware of the offence, to obtain their evidence.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
At any time after commitment of a case but before judgment is passed, the Court to which the commitment is made may, with a view to obtaining at the trial the evidence of any person supposed to have been directly or indirectly concerned in, or privy to, any such offence, tender a pardon on the same condition to such person.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 307
-
Sachin v. State of Maharashtra
Issue arose whether, the High Court could enhance the sentence under its revisional powers in a convict’s appeal against conviction.
- A. Srinivasulu v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of
- Pradeep S. Wodeyar v. The State of Karnataka
- Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Anr.
- Kumar Ghimirey v. The State of Sikkim
- R. Dineshkumar @ Deena v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police & Others
- P.C. Mishra v. State (C.B.I.) & Anr.
- Bangaru Laxman v. State (Through Cbi) & Another
- Chandran @ Manichan @ Maniyan v. State of Kerala
- State of Maharashtra v. Abu Salem Abdul Kayyam Ansari and Ors.
- Sudhir Shantilal Mehta v. C.B.I.
- Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra
- Dipesh Chandak v. Union of India
- Harshad S. Mehta and Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra
- Jasbir Singh v. Vipin Kumar Jaggi and Ors.
- Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
- State of Hlmachal Pradesh v. Surinder Mohan and Ors.
- Rampal Pithwas Rahidass and Ors. v. 'State of Maharashtra Etc.