Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXIV: General Provisions As to Inquiries and Trials
Section 317: Provision for inquiries and trial being held in the absence of accused in certain cases
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
In plain words
If the accused's personal attendance is not necessary for justice, or they persistently disturb proceedings, the court can, recording reasons, proceed in their absence if they are represented by a pleader, and can later require them to attend.
- If they have no pleader or their presence is necessary, the court can adjourn or try them separately.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) At any stage of an inquiry or trial under this Code, if the Judge or Magistrate is satisfied, for reasons to be recorded, that the personal attendance of the accused before the Court is not necessary in the interests of justice, or that the accused persistently disturbs the proceedings in Court, the Judge or Magistrate may, if the accused is represented by a pleader, dispense with his attendance and proceed with such inquiry or trial in his absence, and may, at any subsequent stage of the proceedings, direct the personal attendance of such accused.
(2) If the accused in any such case is not represented by a pleader, or if the Judge or Magistrate considers his personal attendance necessary, he may, if he thinks fit and for reasons to be recorded by him, either adjourn such inquiry or trial, or order that the case of such accused be taken up or tried separately. 1. Ins. by Act 5 of 2009, s. 22 (w.e.f. 31-12-2009).
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 317
-
Jamin & Anr. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
(i) Whether the High Court was right in exercising its revisional jurisdiction for the purpose of setting aside the order of the Trial Court rejecting the second application preferred by the respondent no.2 u/s.319 of…
-
Harshad Gupta v. The State of Chhattisgarh
The Judge who had convicted the appellant was transferred post conviction, before the appellant could be heard on the quantum of sentence and a new Judge was posted in his place. Appellant relying on Sections 353 and…
- Vinod Dua v. Union of India & Ors.
- G H Shiv Kumar Jatia v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar and Another v. Union of India Ministry of Law and Justice and Others
- Sri Rameshwar Yadav & Ors. v. The State of Bihar & Anr.
- Birbal Choudhary@ Mukhiya Jee v. State of Bihar
- M/S. Meters and Instruments Private Limited & Anr. v. Kanchan Mehta
- State (Government of NCT of Delhi) v. Nitin Gunwant Shah
- Rasiklal v. Klsore
- Rajesh Ranjan Yadav & Pappu Yadav v. CBI Through Its Director
- M/S. Bhaskar Industries Ltd. v. M/S. Bhiwani Denim and Apparels Ltd. and Ors.