Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXIV: General Provisions As to Inquiries and Trials
Section 306: Tender of pardon to accomplice
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
(1) With a view to obtaining the evidence of any person supposed to have been directly or indirectly concerned in or privy to an offence to which this section applies, the Chief Judicial Magistrate or a Metropolitan Magistrate at any stage of the investigation or inquiry into, or the trial of, the offence, and the Magistrate of the first class inquiring into or trying the offence, at any stage of the inquiry or trial, may tender a pardon to such person on condition of his making a full and true disclosure of the whole of the circumstances within his knowledge relative to the offence and to every other person concerned, whether as principal or abettor, in the commission thereof.
(2) This section applies to—
(a) any offence triable exclusively by the Court of Session or by the Court of a Special Judge appointed under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 (46 of 1952);
(b) any offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years or with a more severe sentence.
(3) Every Magistrate who tenders a pardon under sub-section (1) shall record—
(a) his reasons for so doing;
(b) whether the tender was or was not accepted by the person to whom it was made, and shall, on application made by the accused, furnish him with a copy of such record free of cost.
(4) Every person accepting a tender of pardon made under sub-section (1)—
(a) shall be examined as a witness in the Court of the Magistrate taking cognizance of the offence and in the subsequent trial, if any;
(b) shall, unless he is already on bail, be detained in custody until the termination of the trial.
(5) Where a person has accepted a tender of pardon made under sub-section (1) and has been examined under sub-section (4), the Magistrate taking cognizance of the offence shall, without making any further inquiry in the case—
(a) commit it for trial—
(i) to the Court of Session if the offence is triable exclusively by that Court or if the Magistrate taking cognizance is the Chief Judicial Magistrate;
(ii) to a Court of Special Judge appointed under the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 (46 of 1952), if the offence is triable exclusively by that Court;
(b) in any other case, make over the case to the Chief Judicial Magistrate who shall try the case himself.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 306
- Pradeep S. Wodeyar v. The State of Karnataka
- Sumedh Singh Saini v. State of Punjab and Another
- Somasundaram @ Somu v. The State Rep. by the Deputy Commissioner of Police
- State Through Cbi, Chennai v. V. Arul Kumar
- R. Dineshkumar @ Deena v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police & Others
- Chandra Prakash v. State of Rajasthan
- P.C. Mishra v. State (C.B.I.) & Anr.
- C.B.I. v. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal & Anr.
- State of Rajasthan v. Balveer @ Balli and Anr.
- Umesh Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr
- Dilip Sudhakar Pendse & Anr. v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Venkatesha v. State of Karnataka
- Central Bureau of Investigation v. Amitbhai Anil Chandra Shah and Another
- Sudevanand v. State Through CBI
- Bangaru Laxman v. State (Through Cbi) & Another
- Prithipal Singh Etc v. State of Punjab & Anr. Etc.
- Mrinal Das & Ors. v. The State of Tripura
- Chandran @ Manichan @ Maniyan v. State of Kerala
- State of Maharashtra v. Abu Salem Abdul Kayyam Ansari and Ors.
- Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar v. State of Maharashtra
- Sitaram Sao@Mungeri v. State of Jharkhand
- Subhash Harnarayanji Laddha v. State of Maharashtra
- Renuka Bai @ Rinku @ Ratan and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
- Dipesh Chandak v. Union of India
- Harshad S. Mehta and Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra
- Jasbir Singh v. Vipin Kumar Jaggi and Ors.
- Rakesh and Anr. v. State of Haryana
- State of Kerala v. P. Sugathan and Anr.
- Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra
- State of Hlmachal Pradesh v. Surinder Mohan and Ors.
- Ranadhir Basu v. State of West Bengal
- P.V. Narasimha Rao Etc. Etc. v. State (Cbl/Spe) Etc. Etc.
- A. Deivendran v. State of Tamil Nadu