Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XXIV: General Provisions As to Inquiries and Trials
Section 311: Power to summon material witness, or examine person present
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Any court can, at any stage, summon a witness, examine anyone present, or recall and re-examine a witness. It must do so if the evidence appears essential to a just decision.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Any Court may, at any stage of any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Code, summon any person as a witness, or examine any person in attendance, though not summoned as a witness, or recall and re-examine any person already examined; and the Court shall summon and examine or recall and re-examine any such person if his evidence appears to it to be essential to the just decision of the case.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 311
-
Tarun Sharma v. State of Haryana.
Conviction of the appellant u/s.302, IPC based on the statement/ dying declaration (Exh. P-34) of the deceased, if ought to be set aside.
-
Waris v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Whether Trial Court ought to have given proper time and opportunity to the legal aid defence counsel to prepare the matter and should have deferred the cross-examination of PW-1 by a reasonable time so as to ensure…
-
K.P. Tamilmaran v. The State by Deputy Superintendent of Police
Whether the High Court was justified in upholding the conviction and sentence of A-15 under Sections 217, 218, Penal Code, 1860 and ss.3(2)(i), 4, SC/ST Act, 1989 and modifying the conviction and sentence of A-14, while…
-
Ramesh A. Naika v. The Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka Etc.
Appellant-R, a bank manager, was convicted of murdering his two minor children, along with his sister-in-law and mother-in-law, in June 2010. His motive stemmed from disapproval of his sister-in-law’s relationship,…
-
Ashutosh Pathak v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
The grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is two-fold. Firstly, the in-part acceptance of his application u/s.311 of the CrPC and consequent non-summoning of witness-K. Secondly, closure of the opportunity to…
-
Sovaran Singh Prajapati v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
a. Whether the Trial Court followed the basic requirements of a fairly conducted trial, in accordance with well-established prepositions of law, before imposing death sentence upon the Appellant/Accused? b. Whether the…
-
Chandrabhan Sudam Sanap v. The State of Maharashtra
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court upholding the conviction of the appellant for rape and murder of the deceased and imposition of death sentence.
-
Shyam Narayan Ram v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. Etc.
Whether the High Court fell in error in remanding the matter to Trial Court and giving liberty to the accused to cross-examine a prosecution witness and allowing the prosecution to lead further evidence in the form of…
-
K. Vadivel v. K. Shanthi & Ors.
Under what circumstances could the power be invoked for further investigation and whether on the facts, further investigation was warranted.
-
Gaurav Maini v. The State of Haryana
Courts below, if justified in convicting and sentencing the appellants for the offences punishable u/ss. 364A, 392 and 120B IPC.
-
Anees v. The State Govt. of NCT
Murder of appellant-accused’s wife in their house in which the appellant, deceased and their 5 year old daughter lived. s.106, Evidence Act, 1872 was invoked and the appellant was convicted u/s.302, IPC for the murder.…
-
State of Karnataka v. T. Naseer @ Nasir @ Thandiantavida
The High Court rejected the applications filed by the prosecution u/s. 311 of the Cr.P.C., seeking recall of PW-189 and to permit the prosecution to produce the report and the certificate u/s. 65B of the Evidence Act,…
-
Munilakshmi v. Narendra Babu & Anr.
Bail granted to Respondent No.1 accused of offences u/ss.109, 120B, 201, 302, 450, 454 r/w s.34, IPC, if to be cancelled, in view of events subsequent to the grant of bail. Bail – Scope of interference – Respondent No.1…
- Harendra Rai v. The State of Bihar & Ors.
- State of Rajasthan v. Asharam @ Ashumal
- Sundar @ Sundarrajan v. State by Inspector of
- M/S. Bls Infrastructure Limited v. M/S. Rajwant Singh & Others
- Lakhan Singh v. Amarjeet Singh & Anr
- Sukhpal Singh Khaira v. The State of Punjab
- Varsha Garg v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
- Manoj Pratap Singh v. The State of Rajasthan
- Rishipal Singh Solanki v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- Nasib Singh v. The State of Punjab & Anr.
- The State Represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police v. Tr N Seenivasagan
- Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Ors.
- Anokhilal v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Rekha Murarka v. The State of West Bengal and Anr.
- Haribhai Malaviya and Ors. v. The State of Gujarat and Anr.
- Manju Devi v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
- Swapan Kumar Chatterjee v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Public Interest Foundation & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- Ratanlal v. Prahlad Jat & Ors.
- Mukesh & Anr. v. State for NCT of Delhi & Ors.
- Amrutbhai Shambhubhai .Patel v. Sumanbhai Kantibhai Patel & Ors.
- State of Haryana v. Ram Mehar & Others Etc. Etc.
- Pooja Pal v. Union of India and Ors.
- Ag v. Shiv Kumar Yadav &Anr.
- Sirajul & Ors. v. The State of U.P. &Anr.
- Mannan Sk & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Anr.
- Mary Pappa Jebamani v. Ganesan & Ors.
- Sister Mina Lalita Baruwa v. State of Orissa and Others
- C.B.I. v. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal
- Selvi J. Jayalalithaa & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Lokesh Kumar Jain v. State of Rajasthan
- Rajaram Prasad Yadav v. State of Bihar & Anr.
- Natasha Singh v. CBI (State)
- Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali v. The State (Govt. of Nct) Delhi
- Ranjan Dwivedi v. C.B.I., Through the Director General
- P. Sanjeeva Rao v. The State of A.P.
- Samaj Parivartan Samudaya & Ors. v. State of Karnataka &Ors.
- Deepak Khinchi v. State of Rajasthan
- Sudevanand v. State Through CBI
- Vijay Kumar v. State of U.P. and Ors.
- Shankara Co-Op Housing Society Ltd. v. M. Prabhakar & Ors.
- Lal Kishore Jha v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Alamelu & Anr. v. State Represented by Inspector of Police
- S. Arul Raja v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Sarju@ Ramu v. State of U.P.
- R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court
- Sethuraman v. Rajamanickam
- Vakil Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar
- Hanuman Ram v. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.
- Godrej Pacific Tech. Ltd. v. Computer Joint India Ltd.
- Himanshu Singh Sabharwal v. State of M.P. and Ors.
- S. Anand v. Vasumathi Chandrasekar
- Umar Mohammad & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
- Guriya@Tabassum Tauquir and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Anr.
- Iddar and Ors. v. Aabida and Anr.
- Balbir Singh v. State of Delhi
- Rama Paswan and Ors. v. State of Jharkhand
- Aloke Nath Dutta and Ors. v. State of West Bengal
- Sasi Thomas v. State and Ors.
- U.T. of Dadra & Haveli and Anr. v. Patel Sinh Mohansinh Chauhan
- State of M.P. v. Badri Y Adav and Anr.
- Satyajit Banerjee and Ors. v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
- State of Rajasthan v. Ikbal Hussen
- Zahira Habibullah Sheikh and Anr. Etc. v. State of Gujarat and Ors. Etc.
- Zahira Habibulla H Sheikh and Anr. v. State of Gujarat and Ors.
- State Through CBI v. Dr. Narayan Warman Nerukar and Anr.
- P. Rama Chandra Rao v. State of Karnataka
- Shailendra Kumar v. State of Bihar and Ors.
- Jasbir Singh v. Vipin Kumar Jaggi and Ors.
- Raj Deo Sharma v. The State of Bihar
- Rajendra Prasad v. The Narcotic Cell Through Its Officer Incharge, Delhi
- State of U.P. v. Sikander Ali and Ors.
- State of Assam v. Muhim Barkataki & Anr