Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVII: Of Offences against Property · Of mischief
Section 436: Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to destroy house, etc
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever commits mischief by fire or any explosive substance, intending to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause, the destruction of any building which is ordinarily used as a place of worship or as a human dwelling or as a place for the custody of property, shall be punished with [imprisonment for life], or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 436
-
Mamman Khan v. State of Haryana
Issue arose whether the orders of the trial court, as affirmed by the High Court, directing segregation of the appellant’s trial from that of the co-accused and requiring the filing of a separate charge sheet solely on…
-
Dhirubhai Bhailalbhai Chauhan & Anr. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in reversing the judgment of acquittal passed by the Trial Court qua the appellants; whether in the facts of the case, mere presence of the appellants at the scene of crime, without…
-
Daljit Singh v. State of Haryana & Anr.
Issue arose as regards the order passed by the High Court refusing to quash the complaint, summoning order and order declaring the appellant a proclaimed offender passed by the Magistrate; whether the proclaimed…
-
State of Haryana v. Dharamraj
In instant appeal, the State seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the sole respondent by the Single Judge of the High Court.
-
Irfan @ Naka v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Whether the prosecution could be said to have proved its case beyond reasonable doubt against the appellant who was convicted for offence punishable u/ss.302, 436 and 326-A, IPC and sentenced to death, for allegedly…
- Dinganglung Gangmei v. Mutum Churamani Meetei
- Sunil Saini & Ors. v. The State of Haryana & Ors.
- Ram Sharan Chaturvedi v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- Parubai v. The State of Maharashtra
- V. Rajaram v. State Represented by the Inspector of Police Cbi/Scb
- Javed Abdul Rajjaq Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra
- State of Uttar Pradesh v. Wasif Haider Etc.
- Shanthamalleshappa v. State of Karnataka
- Romila Thapar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
- Menoka Malik and Others v. The State of West Bengal and Others
- Bhagwan Jagannath Markad & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
- Mohd. Jalees Ansari and Others v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Anil@ Bawa v. State of Haryana
- Yallawa & Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- State of Maharashtra v. Ramlal Devappa Rathod and Others
- Prasad Shrikant Purohit v. State of Maharashtra & Anr
- State of U.P. v. Om Prakash
- Anup Lal Yadav & Anr. v. State of Bihar
- Amar Singh Yadav v. State of U.P.
- Mohd. Haroon & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Ashok Debbarma @ Achak Debbarma v. State of Tripura
- Shatrughan Chauhan & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Vyas Ram @ Vyas Kahar & Ors. v. State of Bihar
- Deepak Rai v. State of Bihar
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayyum Ansari v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Lal Bahadur & Ors. v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- State of Maharashtra v. Fazal Rehman Abdul
- Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi, Bombay
- Ibrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan v. State of Maharashtra
- Essa@ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Stf, CBI Mumbai, Part-Ii
- State of Maharashtra v. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari & Ors.
- State of Madhya Pradesh v. Giriraj Dubey
- Anju Chaudhary v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- Busi Koteswara Rao & Ors. v. State of A.P.
- Rabindra Kumar Pal @ Dara Singh v. Republic of India
- Abubucker Siqqique and Anr. v. The State Represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Cbl/Scb/Chennai, Tamil Nadu
- Sajjan Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Sunder Singh v. State of Uttaranchal
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- C. Muniappan & Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Babubhai v. State of Gujarat & Ors. Etc.
- State of West Bengal & Ors. v. The Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, West Bengal & Ors
- Ram Narayan v. State of U.P.
- Chetu & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Shaikh Majid and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- State of Himachal Pradesh v. Paras Ram and Ors.
- Mohan Raj v. Dimbeswari Saikia & Anr
- Dani Singh and Ors. v. State of Bihar
- Andhra Bank v. W.T. Seshachalam
- Raghunath v. State of Haryana and Ors.
- Mohd. Khalid v. State of West Bengal
- Chandra Bihari Gautam and Ors. v. State of Bihar
- Devender Pal Singh v. State N.C.T. of Delhi and Anr.
- State of Tamil Nadu v. Rajendran
- State Through Superintendent of Police, Cbi/Sit Etc. v. Nalini and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Sajjan Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- Mohd. Iqbal M. Shaikh and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
- Shiv Ram and Anr. Etc. v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- Bilal Ahmad Kaloo v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- Chandubhai Malubhai Parmar and Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- State of UP v. Dan Singh and Ors.
- State of Maharashtra Etc. v. Som Nath Thapa Etc.
- Raja Ram Yadav and Others v. State of Bihar
- Ranbir Yadav v. State of Bihar
- Sheikh Ishaque and Ors. v. State of Bihar
- Stte of West Bengal and Anr. v. Mohammad Khalid and Ors. Etc. Etc.
- Dilaver Hussain Son of Mohammadbhal Laliwala Etc. v. State of Gujarat and Anr.