Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XVII: Of Offences against Property · Of mischief
Section 435: Mischief by fire or explosive substance with intent to cause damage to amount of one hundred or (in case of agricultural produce) ten rupees
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever commits mischief by fire or any explosive substance intending to cause, or knowing it to be likely that he will thereby cause, damage to any property to the amount of one hundred rupees or upwards [or (where the property is agricultural produce) ten rupees or upwards], shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 435
-
State of Karnataka v. T. Naseer @ Nasir @ Thandiantavida
The High Court rejected the applications filed by the prosecution u/s. 311 of the Cr.P.C., seeking recall of PW-189 and to permit the prosecution to produce the report and the certificate u/s. 65B of the Evidence Act,…
- Sunil Saini & Ors. v. The State of Haryana & Ors.
- Narsingh Ispat Ltd v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.
- Palani v. State of Tamil Nadu
- Romila Thapar and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
- State of Maharashtra v. Ramlal Devappa Rathod and Others
- Chandra Prakash v. State of Rajasthan
- Vyas Ram @ Vyas Kahar & Ors. v. State of Bihar
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayyum Ansari v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.
- Kanhaiya Lal & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan
- Hazara Singh v. Raj Kumar and Ors.
- State of Maharashtra v. Fazal Rehman Abdul
- Essa@ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Stf, CBI Mumbai, Part-Ii
- Ibrahim Musa Chauhan @ Baba Chauhan v. State of Maharashtra
- Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, Through Cbi, Bombay
- Munna Kumar Upadhyaya @ Munna Upadhyaya v. The State of Andhra Pradesh Through Public Prosecutor, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
- Rabindra Kumar Pal @ Dara Singh v. Republic of India
- Sajjan Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Abu Salem Abdul Qayoom Ansari v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- C. Magesh and Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- State of Maharashtra Etc. v. Som Nath Thapa Etc.
- Surjit Singh Alias Gurmit Singh v. State of Punjab
- Nadodi Jayaraman Etc. v. State of Tamil Nadu