- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 11 November 2024
- Bench
- Rekha Palli, Saurabh Banerjee
- Case no.
- MAT.APP.(F.C.) 365/2024
Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Rekha PalliFollow Saurabh Banerjee
Judgment
O R D E R
¶1The present appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 seeks to assail the impugned order dated 20.09.2024 passed by the learned Family Court in Execution Petition No.26/2024. Vide the impugned order, the learned Family Court has, after accepting the respondent's stand that after the passing of the interim order dated 17.10.2023, the appellant had paid only ₹63,000/- towards maintenance to her, issued warrants of attachment against the appellant qua his movable property.
¶2The primary submission of the learned counsel for the appellant is that the impugned order has been passed without taking into account the amount paid already to the respondent by the appellant on his own volition from the date of filing of the interim application, i.e. 26.09.2019, under This is a digitally signed order. Section 26 of the HMA, 1955.
¶3From a perusal of the impugned order, we find that this plea does not appear to have been raised before the learned Family Court. We, therefore, grant liberty.
¶4When faced with this situation, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal and approach the learned Family Court by way of an application to seek clarification in this regard.
¶5The appeal, alongwith the pending applications, is accordingly, dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. We make it clear that if an application is moved by the appellant within ten days for clarification/ modification regarding the payment already claimed to have been paid to the respondent, the same will be considered on merits by the learned Family Court
REKHA PALLI, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J NOVEMBER 11, 2024/So This is a digitally signed order.
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 365/2024, CM APPL. 65685/2024-Exp & CM APPL. 65684/2024-Stay AAKASH CHOPRA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Tiwari, Mr. Kumar Deepraj, Ms. Arushi Rathore and Mr. Rachit Gupta, Advocates versus SVIKARNI SINGH CHOPRA .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE % 11.11.2024
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.