Sachin Solanki v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors

O R D E R %

10.11.2025

¶1Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been file for quashing of FIR No. 0467/2023 registered under Sections 308/34 IPC at P.S. Dwarka South in terms of the Settlement dated 18.05.2024 between the Petitioner and the Respondents No.2 and 3.

¶2Learned Counsel on behalf of the State submits that this is a case of partial quashing. 05 Accused have joined the investigations after which, the Chargesheet against them has been filed in the Court. The present Petitioner did not join the investigations and thereafter, has entered into the Settlement with the Respondents No. 2 and 3. This kind of partial quashing with one This is a digitally signed order. Accused, who has failed to join the investigations, is vehemently opposed. Submissions heard and record perused.

¶3According to the Petitioner, he is not visible in the CCTV footage and therefore, the Respondents No. 2 and 3 have agreed to settle the matter, which is also endorsed by the Counsel for the Respondents No. 2 and 3.

¶4From the submissions made on behalf of the State, it is evident that the Petitioner, who fails to join the investigations and thereafter, tries to take advantage by entering into a compromise with the Complainant. This is not a bona fide quashing sought on behalf of the Petitioner.

¶5Accordingly, present Petition stands dismissed.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 10, 2025 N

This is a digitally signed order.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 1634/2024 SACHIN SOLANKI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mehul Gulati, Mr. Ankush, Mr. Tarun Maan and Mr. Naman Chowdhary, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advocates for the State alongwith SI Rajesh Kumar, DIU Dwarka Ms. Kavya and Ms. Sonali Singh, Advocates for R-2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA