VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2025 › High Court of Delhi

Shri Mukesh Garg v. The State (Nct of Delhi) Through Its Standing Counsel

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
12 November 2025
Bench
Neena Bansal Krishnaauthor
Case no.
W.P.(CRL) 768/2024

Follow Delhi High CourtFollow Neena Bansal Krishna

Judgment

O R D E R %

12.11.2025

¶1A Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for directing the Respondent to investigate the matter under Section 307/326/506/120B IPC in FIR No.989/2023 dated 24.12.2023 under Section 325 IPC.

¶2It is a settled law that on the basis of a Complaint, FIR may be registered under a particular Section, but there is nothing to prevent the Police or the Investigating Agency to amend or file the Chargesheet under the Sections which are made out after the investigations. Since, as per the Petitioner himself the investigations are still ongoing in the FIR and the Chargesheet is yet to be filed, the directions as sought are not sustainable in law.

¶3The Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to agitate This is a digitally signed order. these aspects once the Chargesheet is filed before the Trial Court.

¶4The Petition stands disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J NOVEMBER 12, 2025 va

This is a digitally signed order.

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 768/2024 SHRI MUKESH GARG .....Petitioner Through: Appearance not given. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH ITS STANDING COUNSEL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for State with SI Mahvir PS DBG Road. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.