Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 · Chapter III: Enforcement of Security Interest
Section 18: Appeal to Appellate Tribunal
(1) Any person aggrieved, by any order made by the Debts Recovery Tribunal [under section 17, may prefer an appeal along with such fee, as may be prescribed]to the Appellate Tribunal within thirty days from the date of receipt of the order of Debts Recovery Tribunal.
[Provided that different fees may be prescribed for filing an appeal by the borrower or by the person other than the borrower:]
[Provided further that no appeal shall be entertained unless the borrower has deposited with the Appellate Tribunal fifty per cent. of the amount of debt due from him, as claimed by the secured creditors or determined by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, whichever is less:
Provided also that the Appellate Tribunal may, for the reasons to be recorded in writing, reduce the amount to not less than twenty-five per cent. of debt referred to in the second proviso.]
(2) Save as otherwise provided in this Act, the Appellate Tribunal shall, as far as may be, dispose of the appeal in accordance with the provisions of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (51 of 1993) and rules made thereunder.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 18
-
Delhi Development Authority v. Corporation Bank & Ors.
Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the auction was per se illegal being conducted in violation of the terms and conditions of the lease deed and the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Income Tax…
-
PNB Housing Finance Limited v. Sh. Manoj Saha & Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in directing the appellant to hand back the possession of the secured asset to the 1 st respondent; whether the 1st Respondent failed to establish pre-existing tenancy in his favour.
- Ats Infrabuild Pvt Ltd and Anr v. Idbi Trusteeship Services Private Limited
- Veena Jain v. City Union Bank Limited & Ors
- Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. M/S Anoop Oswal Hosiery and Ors
-
PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank and Others
Matter pertains to the High Courts entertaining petitions arising out of the DRT Act and the SARFAESI Act in spite of availability of an effective alternative remedy.
- Magnum Steels Ltd & Ors v. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. & Anr
- Naresh Kumar Aggarwal v. State Bank of India
- Golden Netsoft Pvt Ltd v. Hdfc Bank Ltd and Ors
- Ifci Venture Capital Funds Limited v. Srgp Corporation Limited
- Sh Devki Nandan and Anr v. M/S Capri Global Housing Finance Limited and Ors
- Idfc First Bank Limited v. Union of India and Ors
- Vikash Mathur v. Kotak Mahindra Bank and Anr
- Sidha Neelkanth Paper Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. Prudent Arc Ltd. & Others
- Varimadugu Obi Reddy v. B. Sreenivasulu & Ors.
- M/S. Newtech Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. State of UP & Ors. Etc.
- Sesh Nath Singh & Anr. v. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Anr.
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Pvt. Limited v. Ambuj A. Kasliwal & Ors.
- M/S. Tripower Enterprises (Private) Limited v. State Bank of India & Ors.
- M/S Kut Energy Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. The Authorized Officer, Punjab National Bank, Large Corporate Branch, Ludhiana & Ors.
- Axis Bank v. Sbs Organics Private Limited and Another
- M/S Madras Petrochem Ltd. & Anr v. Bifr& Ors.
- Baleshwar Dayal Jaiswal v. Bank of India & Ors.
- Vasu P. Shetty v. M/S Hotel Vandana Palace & Ors.
- Standard Chartered Bank v. Dharminder Bhohi and Others
- Narayan Chandra Ghosh v. Uco Bank & Ors.
- M/S Transcore v. Union of India and Anr.