Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 · Chapter III: Enforcement of Security Interest
Section 13: Enforcement of security interest
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 69 or section 69A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (4 of 1882), any security interest created in favour of any secured creditor may be enforced, without the intervention of the court or tribunal, by such creditor in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
(2) Where any borrower, who is under a liability to a secured creditor under a security agreement, makes any default in repayment of secured debt or any instalment thereof, and his account in respect of such debt is classified by the secured creditor as non-performing asset, then, the secured creditor may require the borrower by notice in writing to discharge in full his liabilities to the secured creditor within sixty days from the date of notice failing which the secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise all or any of the rights under sub-section (4).
[Provided that—
(i) the requirement of classification of secured debt as non-performing asset under this sub-section shall not apply to a borrower who has raised funds through issue of debt securities; and
(ii) in the event of default, the debenture trustee shall be entitled to enforce security interest in the same manner as provided under this section with such modifications as may be necessary and in accordance with the terms and conditions of security documents executed in favour of the debenture trustee.]
(3) The notice referred to in sub-section (2) shall give details of the amount payable by the borrower and the secured assets intended to be enforced by the secured creditor in the event of non-payment of secured debts by the borrower.
[(3A) If, on receipt of the notice under sub-section (2), the borrower makes any representation or raises any objection, the secured creditor shall consider such representation or objection and if the secured creditor comes to the conclusion that such representation or objection is not acceptable or tenable, he shall communicate [within fifteen days] of receipt of such representation or objection the reasons for nonacceptance of the representation or objection to the borrower:
Provided that the reasons so communicated or the likely action of the secured creditor at the stage of communication of reasons shall not confer any right upon the borrower to prefer an application to the Debts Recovery Tribunal under section 17 or the Court of District Judge under section 17A.]
(4) In case the borrower fails to discharge his liability in full within the period specified in sub-section (2), the secured creditor may take recourse to one or more of the following measures to recover his secured debt, namely:—
(a) take possession of the secured assets of the borrower including the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale for realising the secured asset;
[(b) take over the management of the business of the borrower including the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale for realising the secured asset:
Provided that the right to transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale shall be exercised only where the substantial part of the business of the borrower is held as security for the debt:
Provided further that where the management of whole of the business or part of the business is severable, the secured creditor shall take over the management of such business of the borrower which is relatable to the security for the debt;]
(c) appoint any person (hereafter referred to as the manager), to manage the secured assets the possession of which has been taken over by the secured creditor;
(d) require at any time by notice in writing, any person who has acquired any of the secured assets from the borrower and from whom any money is due or may become due to the borrower, to pay the secured creditor, so much of the money as is sufficient to pay the secured debt.
(5) Any payment made by any person referred to in clause (d) of sub-section (4) to the secured creditor shall give such person a valid discharge as if he has made payment to the borrower.
[(5A) Where the sale of an immovable property, for which a reserve price has been specified, has been postponed for want of a bid of an amount not less than such reserve price, it shall be lawful for any officer of the secured creditor, if so authorised by the secured creditor in this behalf, to bid for the immovable property on behalf of the secured creditor at any subsequent sale.
(5B) Where the secured creditor, referred to in sub-section (5A), is declared to be the purchaser of the immovable property at any subsequent sale, the amount of the purchase price shall be adjusted towards the amount of the claim of the secured creditor for which the auction of enforcement of security interest is taken by the secured creditor, under sub-section (4) of section 13.
(5C)The provisions of section 9 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949) shall, as far as may be, apply to the immovable property acquired by secured creditor under sub-section (5A).]
(6) Any transfer of secured asset after taking possession thereof or take over of management under sub-section (4), by the secured creditor or by the manager on behalf of the secured creditor shall vest in the transferee all rights in, or in relation to, the secured asset transferred as if the transfer had been made by the owner of such secured asset.
(7) Where any action has been taken against a borrower under the provisions of sub-section (4), all costs, charges and expenses which, in the opinion of the secured creditor, have been properly incurred by him or any expenses incidental thereto, shall be recoverable from the borrower and the money which is received by the secured creditor shall, in the absence of any contract to the contrary, be held by him in trust, to be applied, firstly, in payment of such costs, charges and expenses and secondly, in discharge of the dues of the secured creditor and the residue of the money so received shall be paid to the person entitled thereto in accordance with his rights and interests.
[(8) Where the amount of dues of the secured creditor together with all costs, charges and expenses incurred by him is tendered to the secured creditor at any time before the date of publication of notice for public auction or inviting quotations or tender from public or private treaty for transfer by way of lease, assignment or sale of the secured assets,—
(i) the secured assets shall not be transferred by way of lease assignment or sale by the secured creditor; and
(ii) in case, any step has been taken by the secured creditor for transfer by way of lease or assignment or sale of the assets before tendering of such amount under this sub-section, no further step shall be taken by such secured creditor for transfer by way of lease or assignment or sale of such secured assets.]
(9) [Subject to the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, in the case of] financing of a financial asset by more than one secured creditors or joint financing of a financial asset by secured creditors, no secured creditor shall be entitled to exercise any or all of the rights conferred on him under or pursuant to sub-section (4) unless exercise of such right is agreed upon by the secured creditors representing not less than [sixty per cent.] in value of the amount outstanding as on a record date and such action shall be binding on all the secured creditors:
Provided that in the case of a company in liquidation, the amount realised from the sale of secured assets shall be distributed in accordance with the provisions of section 529A of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956):
Provided further that in the case of a company being wound up on or after the commencement of this Act, the secured creditor of such company, who opts to realise his security instead of relinquishing his security and proving his debt under proviso to sub-section (1) of section 529 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), may retain the sale proceeds of his secured assets after depositing the workmen's dues with the liquidator in accordance with the provisions of section 529A of that Act:
Provided also that liquidator referred to in the second proviso shall intimate the secured creditor the workmen's dues in accordance with the provisions of section 529A of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) and in case such workmen's dues cannot be ascertained, the liquidator shall intimate the estimated amount of workmen's dues under that section to the secured creditor and in such case the secured creditor may retain the sale proceeds of the secured assets after depositing the amount of such estimate dues with the liquidator:
Provided also that in case the secured creditor deposits the estimated amount of workmen's dues, such creditor shall be liable to pay the balance of the workmen's dues or entitled to receive the excess amount, if any, deposited by the secured creditor with the liquidator:
Provided also that the secured creditor shall furnish an undertaking to the liquidator to pay the balance of the workmen's dues, if any.
Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section,—
(a) "record date" means the date agreed upon by the secured creditors representing not less than [sixty per cent.] in value of the amount outstanding on such date;
(b) "amount outstanding" shall include principal, interest and any other dues payable by the borrower to the secured creditor in respect of secured asset as per the books of account of the secured creditor.
(10) Where dues of the secured creditor are not fully satisfied with the sale proceeds of the secured assets, the secured creditor may file an application in the form and manner as may be prescribed to the Debts Recovery Tribunal having jurisdiction or a competent court, as the case may be, for recovery of the balance amount from the borrower.
(11) Without prejudice to the rights conferred on the secured creditor under or by this section, secured creditor shall be entitled to proceed against the guarantors or sell the pledged assets without first taking any of the measured specifies in clauses (a) to (d) of sub-section (4) in relation to the secured assets under this Act.
(12) The rights of a secured creditor under this Act may be exercised by one or more of his officers authorised in this behalf in such manner as may be prescribed.
(13) No borrower shall, after receipt of notice referred to in sub-section (2), transfer by way of sale, lease or otherwise (other than in the ordinary course of his business) any of his secured assets referred to in the notice, without prior written consent of the secured creditor.
State amendments to this section
Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh (UTs).—
Amendment of section 13.—In sub-section (3A), in proviso thereto, omit "or the Court of District Judge under section 17A"
[Vide Order No. 3807(E) dated 26th October, 2020, the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Adaptation of Central Laws) Third Order, 2020 (w.e.f. 26-10-2020) and Vide Union Territory of Ladakh Reorganisation (Adaptation of Central Laws) Order, 2020, notification No. S.O. 3774(E), dated (23-10-2020).]
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 13
-
Satheesh V.K. v. The Federal Bank Ltd.
Issue arose as regards the maintainability of the second SLP challenging the same order where the first SLP was withdrawn without leave to re-approach.
-
Assistant General Manager State Bank of India & Anr. v. Tanya Energy Enterprises
(i) Whether the High Court erred in its interference with the order of rejection of the respondent’s application under the One Time Settlement 2020 Scheme and directing reconsideration thereof; (ii) Whether, a court can…
-
Anil Khandelwal Etc. v. Phoenix India and Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in rejecting the quashing petition filed by the appellants-Officers of the Bank challenging the order passed by the Magistrate issuing process against them for the offences punishable…
-
Shri Shri Swami Samarth Construction & Finance Solution & Anr v. The Board of Directors of Nkgsb Co-Op. Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Lending banks/secured creditors, if under an obligation, in terms of the notification dated 29.05.2015 containing the “Framework For Revival And Rehabilitation Of Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises” (Framework), to…
-
PNB Housing Finance Limited v. Sh. Manoj Saha & Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in directing the appellant to hand back the possession of the secured asset to the 1 st respondent; whether the 1st Respondent failed to establish pre-existing tenancy in his favour.
-
Central Bank of India & Anr. v. Smt. Prabha Jain & Ors.
Whether the jurisdiction of civil court to try a suit is completely barred by s.34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
-
Celir LLP v. Mr. Sumati Prasad Bafna & Ors.
The present petitions sought to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents/alleged contemnors for wilful disobedience of the final judgment and order dated 21.09.2023 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.…
- Ats Infrabuild Pvt Ltd and Anr v. Idbi Trusteeship Services Private Limited
- Indu Narain v. State Bank of India & Ors
- Disruptive Health Solutions Private Limited & Ors v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited & Anr
- Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. Shomuk Engineering and Consultancy Services and Ors
- Rahul Singh v. Bank of Baroda
- Veena Jain v. City Union Bank Limited & Ors
- Shri Ram Chander v. Shri Devinder Prakash Vija Y & Ors
- Shri Babu Ram v. Union of India Through Ministry of Home Affairs Union of India & Ors
- Smt. Lakshmi Singhal v. Union of India Through Ministry of Home Affairs, Union of India & Ors
- Shri Deepak Singhal v. Union of India Through Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors
- Naresh Kumar Sharma v. Ministry of Corporate Affairs and Ors
- Vikas Goel v. Union of India
- Mr. Ajay Mrig v. Union of India & Ors
- Anil Goel v. Union of India and Ors
- Sh. Sahil Chugh v. Union of India & Ors
- Usha Sindhu v. Union of India & Ors
- Sh. Mehul Kumar Chugh v. Union of India & Ors
- Gurmeet Singh Matharoo v. Union of India and Ors
- J.C. Flowers Asset Reconstructions Pvt. Ltd v. Union of Inda & Ors
- Sanjay Dhingra v. 1. Idbi Bank Limited & Ors
- Ms Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited v. Sh Mahesh Taneja and Ors
- Mr. Ravinder Kumar Garg v. Punjab National Bank
- O.P.Sharma v. Punjab National Bank & Anr
- Sankhajit Pramanik v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
- Brij Mohan Mahajan v. Indian Bank (Erstwhile Allahabad Bank) & Anr
- Sanjeev Mahajan v. Indian Bank (Erstwhile Allahabad Bank) & Anr
- Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. M/S Anoop Oswal Hosiery and Ors
- Nimit Mahajan v. Indian Bank (Erstwhile Allahabad Bank) & Anr
- Samiksha Mahajan v. Indian Bank & Anr
- Zahid Hussain v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd
- Gopal Bansal v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
-
PHR Invent Educational Society v. UCO Bank and Others
Matter pertains to the High Courts entertaining petitions arising out of the DRT Act and the SARFAESI Act in spite of availability of an effective alternative remedy.
- Magnum Steels Ltd & Ors v. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. & Anr
- Naresh Kumar Aggarwal v. State Bank of India
- Paisalo Digital Limited v. Sat Priya Mehamia Memorial Educational Trust & Ors
- Lalit Polyplast Private Limited & Anr v. Bank of Baroda & Ors
- Smt. Vimla Sharma & Ors v. M/S Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd & Anr
- Ifci Venture Capital Funds Limited v. Srgp Corporation Limited
- Sh Devki Nandan and Anr v. M/S Capri Global Housing Finance Limited and Ors
- M/S Subhash Chand Kathuria v. Punjab National Bank
-
The Authorised Officer, Central Bank of India v. Shanmugavelu
(i)Whether, the underlying principle of Section(s) 73 & 74 respectively of the Contract Act, 1872 Act is applicable to forfeiture of earnest-money deposit under Rule 9(5) of the SARFAESI Rules. In other words, whether…
- M/S Kalyani (India) Private Limited v. Punjab National Bank Through Its Chief Manager & Anr
- Gajender Singh Drall and Ors v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
- Yudhvir Singh & Anr v. Govt. of NCT of Dlehi & Ors
- Dr. Snehashish Bhattacharya & Ors v. South Asian University
- Keshav Datt v. South Asian University
- Hulas Rahul Gupta v. Bureau of Immigration & Ors
- Rajender Kumar Pahwa & Ors v. Bureau of Immigration Anr
- Reshma Garg v. Union of India & Anr
- Ashish Abrol & Anr v. Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited & Anr
-
Punjab & Sind Bank v. The State of Punjab & Anr.
High Court whether justified in sustaining the State’s claim of priority in respect of dues under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005 of the Respondent no.2 (defaulting borrower), superseding the bank’s claim based on…
- Aditya Birla Finance Limited v. Shri Jagannath Memorial Educational Trust and Ors
- Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd v. Kaushalya Devi & Ors
- Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd v. Rishi Pal Sharma & Ors
- Mis Deco Industries India v. Jm Financial Assets Reconstruction Company Ltd Through Its Ao Kumar Gaurav & Ors
- Deco Industries (India) v. Jm Financial Assets Reconstruction Company Ltd & Ors
- Idfc First Bank Limited v. Union of India and Ors
-
Union Bank of India v. Rajat Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. &
Applicant-Auction Purchaser sought directions against the Appellant-Bank for issuance of sale letter in its favour on the ground that it has made the full and final payment of the auct ion amount with interest in terms…
- Angika Development Society v. Union of India & Ors
- Celir Llp v. Bafna Motors (Mumbai) Pvt.
-
Axis Bank Limited v. Naren Sheth & Anr.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant upholding the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority whereby it admitted the application u/s.7, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 filed by Respondent No.2-Secured…
- Prahalad Dutta Lata v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. and Ors
- Ruchi Garg v. Union of India & Anr
- Amit Guglani & Anr v. L and T Housing Finance Ltd. Through-Managing Director & Anr
- M/S Diamond Entertainment Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors v. Religare Finvest Limited Through Its Authorized Officer
- Girish Bansal & Ors v. Yashpal Singla & Ors
- Rajesh Kumar Mehta v. Union of India & Ors
- Vanya Jain v. Ambit Finvest Pvt Ltd and Ors
- Vikash Mathur v. Kotak Mahindra Bank and Anr
- Ashok Tiwari and Ors v. Canara Bank and Ors
- G. Vikram Kumar v. State Bank of Hyderabad &
- Seema Sahni v. The Punjab National Bank and Ors
- Punjab and Sind Bank v. Frontline Corporation
- M/S South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. v. Naveen
- Authorised Officer State Bank of India v. C. Natarajan & Anr
- Ashima Goyal v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr
- Victory Iron Works Ltd. v. Jitendra Lohia & Anr.
- Supertech Urban5 Home Buyers Association (Suha) Foundation v. Union of India & Ors
- Gautam Sethi & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
- Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. & Anr v. Shipra Leasing Pvt. Ltd
- Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. & Anr v. Shipra Hotels Ltd
- Dakshesh I Shroff v. State Bank of India & Ors
- K. Sreedhar v. M/S Raus Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Girnar Corrugators
- Sidha Neelkanth Paper Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. Prudent Arc Ltd. & Others
- Mr.Dhanesh Gupta and Ors v. Reserve Bank of India and Anr
- Varimadugu Obi Reddy v. B. Sreenivasulu & Ors.
- Balkrishna Rama Tarle Dead Thr Lrs & Anr v. Phoenix Arc Private Limited & Ors
- Punjab National Bank v. Mr. Vijay Sitaram Dandnaik & Anr.
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Kew Precision Parts Private Limited & Ors.
- Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Tulip Star Hotels Limited & Ors.
- M/S R. D. Jain and Co. v. Capital First Ltd. & Ors.
- M/S. R.S. Infra-Transmission Ltd. v. Saurinindubhai Patel and Ors.