Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 · Chapter III: Enforcement of Security Interest
Section 14: Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate to assist secured creditor in taking possession of secured asset
(1) Where the possession of any secured assets is required to be taken by the secured creditor or if any of the secured assets is required to be sold or transferred by the secured creditor under the provisions of this Act, the secured creditor may, for the purpose of taking possession or control of any such secured assets, request, in writing, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or the District Magistrate within whose jurisdiction any such secured asset or other documents relating thereto may be situated or found, to take possession thereof, and the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or as the case may be, the District Magistrate shall, on such request being made to him—
(a) take possession of such asset and documents relating thereto; and
(b) forward such asset and documents to the secured creditor:
[Provided that any application by the secured creditor shall be accompanied by an affidavit duly affirmed by the authorised officer of the secured creditor, declaring that—-
(i) the aggregate amount of financial assistance granted and the total claim of the Bank as on the date of filing the application;
(ii) the borrower has created security interest over various properties and that the Bank or Financial Institution is holding a valid and subsisting security interest over such properties and the claim of the Bank or Financial Institution is within the limitation period;
(iii) the borrower has created security interest over various properties giving the details of properties referred to in sub-clause (ii)above;
(iv) the borrower has committed default in repayment of the financial assistance granted aggregating the specified amount;
(v) consequent upon such default in repayment of the financial assistance the account of the borrower has been classified as a non-performing asset;
(vi) affirming that the period of sixty days notice as required by the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 13, demanding payment of the defaulted financial assistance has been served on the borrower;
(vii) the objection or representation in reply to the notice received from the borrower has been considered by the secured creditor and reasons for non-acceptance of such objection or representation had been communicated to the borrower;
(viii) the borrower has not made any repayment of the financial assistance in spite of the above notice and the Authorised Officer is, therefore, entitled to take possession of the secured assets under the provisions of sub-section (4) of section 13 read with section 14 of the principal Act;
(ix) that the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder had been complied with:
Provided further that on receipt of the affidavit from the Authorised Officer, the District Magistrate or the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be, shall after satisfying the contents of the affidavit pass suitable orders for the purpose of taking possession of the secured assets [within a period of thirty days from the date of application:]
[Provided also that if no order is passed by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate within the said period of thirty days for reasons beyond his control, he may, after recording reasons in writing for the same, pass the order within such further period but not exceeding in aggregate sixty days.]
Provided also that the requirement of filing affidavit stated in the first proviso shall not apply to proceeding pending before any District Magistrate or the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be, on the date of commencement of this Act.]
[(1A) The District Magistrate or the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate may authorise any officer subordinate to him,—
(i) to take possession of such assets and documents relating thereto; and
(ii) to forward such assets and documents to the secured creditor.]
(2) For the purpose of securing compliance with the provisions of sub-section (1), the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or the District Magistrate may take or cause to be taken such steps and use, or cause to be used, such force, as may, in his opinion, be necessary.
(3) No act of the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or the District Magistrate [any officer authorised by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate] done in pursuance of this section shall be called in question in any court or before any authority.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 14 October 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 14
-
Shri Shri Swami Samarth Construction & Finance Solution & Anr v. The Board of Directors of Nkgsb Co-Op. Bank Ltd. & Ors.
Lending banks/secured creditors, if under an obligation, in terms of the notification dated 29.05.2015 containing the “Framework For Revival And Rehabilitation Of Micro, Small And Medium Enterprises” (Framework), to…
-
PNB Housing Finance Limited v. Sh. Manoj Saha & Anr.
Whether the High Court erred in directing the appellant to hand back the possession of the secured asset to the 1 st respondent; whether the 1st Respondent failed to establish pre-existing tenancy in his favour.
-
Celir LLP v. Mr. Sumati Prasad Bafna & Ors.
The present petitions sought to initiate contempt proceedings against the respondents/alleged contemnors for wilful disobedience of the final judgment and order dated 21.09.2023 passed by this Court in Civil Appeal Nos.…
- Ats Infrabuild Pvt Ltd and Anr v. Idbi Trusteeship Services Private Limited
- Veena Jain v. City Union Bank Limited & Ors
- Mukesh Kumar Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi
- Sanjay Dhingra v. 1. Idbi Bank Limited & Ors
- Ms Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited v. Sh Mahesh Taneja and Ors
-
Child in Conflict With Law Through His Mother v. The State of Karnataka and Another
(i) Whether the period provided for completion of preliminary assessment u/s. 14(3) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is mandatory or directory; (ii) Whether the words ‘Children’s…
- Gopal Bansal v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
- Zahid Hussain v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd
- Magnum Steels Ltd & Ors v. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. & Anr
- Paisalo Digital Limited v. Sat Priya Mehamia Memorial Educational Trust & Ors
- Smt. Vimla Sharma & Ors v. M/S Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd & Anr
- Ifci Venture Capital Funds Limited v. Srgp Corporation Limited
- Sh Devki Nandan and Anr v. M/S Capri Global Housing Finance Limited and Ors
- M/S Subhash Chand Kathuria v. Punjab National Bank
- Rajeev Khattar v. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd & Ors
- Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Co. Ltd v. Kaushalya Devi & Ors
- Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd v. Rishi Pal Sharma & Ors
- Idfc First Bank Limited v. Union of India and Ors
-
Union Bank of India v. Rajat Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. &
Applicant-Auction Purchaser sought directions against the Appellant-Bank for issuance of sale letter in its favour on the ground that it has made the full and final payment of the auct ion amount with interest in terms…
-
Axis Bank Limited v. Naren Sheth & Anr.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant upholding the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority whereby it admitted the application u/s.7, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 filed by Respondent No.2-Secured…
- M/S Diamond Entertainment Technologies Pvt. Ltd. & Ors v. Religare Finvest Limited Through Its Authorized Officer
- Girish Bansal & Ors v. Yashpal Singla & Ors
- Vanya Jain v. Ambit Finvest Pvt Ltd and Ors
- Vikash Mathur v. Kotak Mahindra Bank and Anr
- Vishal Aggarwal & Anr v. Union Bank of India & Ors
- Ashok Tiwari and Ors v. Canara Bank and Ors
- Seema Sahni v. The Punjab National Bank and Ors
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Girnar Corrugators
- Mr.Dhanesh Gupta and Ors v. Reserve Bank of India and Anr
- Mrs. Leelamma Mathew v. M/S Indian Overseas Bank & Ors.
- Balkrishna Rama Tarle Dead Thr Lrs & Anr v. Phoenix Arc Private Limited & Ors
- M/S R. D. Jain and Co. v. Capital First Ltd. & Ors.
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Narendra Jayantilal Trivedi & Anr.
- Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited v. Subir Chakravarty & Ors.
- Bank of Baroda v. M/S Karwa Trading Company & Anr.
- Phoenix Arc Private Limited v. Vishwa Bharati Vidya Mandir & Ors.
- Arce Polymers Private Limited v. M/S. Alphine Pharmaceuticals Private Limited and Others
- S. Karthik & Ors. v. N. Subhash Chand Jain & Ors.
- Hemraj Ratnakar Salian v. Hdfc Bank Ltd. & Ors.
- Sesh Nath Singh & Anr. v. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Anr.
- C. Bright v. The District Collector & Ors.
- K. Virupaksha & Anr. v. The State of Karnataka & Anr.
- The Authorised Officer, Indian Bank v. D. Visalakshi and Anr.
- Bajarang Shyamsunder Agarwal v. Central Bank of India & Anr.
- Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited v. M/S. Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited and Others
- Pratibha Ramesh Patel v. Union of India and Ors.
- Vishal N. Kalsaria v. Bank of India & Ors.
- Pegasus Assets Reconstruction P. Ltd. v. M/S. Haryanaconcast Limited &Anr.
- Harshad Govardhan Sondagar v. International Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
- Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
- United Bank of India v. Satyawati Tondon and Others