Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 · Chapter II: Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
Section 7: Initiation of corporate insolvency resolution process by financial creditor
(1) A financial creditor either by itself or jointly with [other financial creditors, or any other person on behalf of the financial creditor, as may be notified by the Central Government,] may file an application for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process against a corporate debtor before the Adjudicating Authority when a default has occurred.
[Provided that for the financial creditors, referred to in clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (6A) of section 21, an application for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor shall be filed jointly by not less than one hundred of such creditors in the same class or not less than ten per cent. of the total number of such creditors in the same class, whichever is less:
Provided further that for financial creditors who are allottees under a real estate project, an application for initiating corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor shall be filed jointly by not less than one hundred of such allottees under the same real estate project or not less than ten per cent. of the total number of such allottees under the same real estate project, whichever is less:
Provided also that where an application for initiating the corporate insolvency resolution process against a corporate debtor has been filed by a financial creditor referred to in the first and second provisos and has not been admitted by the Adjudicating Authority before the commencement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020, such application shall be modified to comply with the requirements of the first or second proviso within thirty days of the commencement of the said Act, failing which the application shall be deemed to be withdrawn before its admission.]
Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, a default includes a default in respect of a financial debt owed not only to the applicant financial creditor but to any other financial creditor of the corporate debtor.
(2) The financial creditor shall make an application under sub-section (1) in such form and manner and accompanied with such fee as may be prescribed.
(3) The financial creditor shall, along with the application furnish—
(a) record of the default recorded with the information utility or such other record or evidence of default as may be specified;
(b) the name of the resolution professional proposed to act as an interim resolution professional; and
(c) any other information as may be specified by the Board.
(4) The Adjudicating Authority shall, within fourteen days of the receipt of the application under sub-section (2), ascertain the existence of a default from the records of an information utility or on the basis of other evidence furnished by the financial creditor under sub-section (3).
[Provided that if the Adjudicating Authority has not ascertained the existence of default and passed an order under sub-section (5) within such time, it shall record its reasons in writing for the same.]
(5) Where the Adjudicating Authority is satisfied that—
(a) a default has occurred and the application under sub-section (2) is complete, and there is no disciplinary proceedings pending against the proposed resolution professional, it may, by order, admit such application; or
(b) default has not occurred or the application under sub-section (2) is incomplete or any disciplinary proceeding is pending against the proposed resolution professional, it may, by order, reject such application:
Provided that the Adjudicating Authority shall, before rejecting the application under clause (b) of sub-section (5), give a notice to the applicant to rectify the defect in his application within seven days of receipt of such notice from the Adjudicating Authority.
(6) The corporate insolvency resolution process shall commence from the date of admission of the application under sub-section (5).
(7) The Adjudicating Authority shall communicate—
(a) the order under clause (a) of sub-section (5) to the financial creditor and the corporate debtor;
(b) the order under clause (b) of sub-section (5) to the financial creditor,
within seven days of admission or rejection of such application, as the case may be.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 12 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 7
-
MMTC Limited v. Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pvt. Limited
Issue arose whether the High Court was justified in not entertaining the objections filed by the appellant u/s.47 CPC and in dismissing the same; and whether at least prima facie the case of breach of fiduciary duty has…
-
Mansi Brar Fernandes v. Shubha Sharma and Anr.
Whether the appellants, fall within the category of “speculative investors” so as to disentitle them from initiating proceedings u/s.7 of the IBC; whether the Ordinance/Amendment Act introducing threshold requirements…
-
Amit Nehra & Anr. v. Pawan Kumar Garg & Ors.
Whether the appellants, being allottees of an apartment in a project developed by the erstwhile Corporate Debtor and having admittedly paid a sum of Rs.57,56,684/- out of the total consideration of Rs.60,06,368/-, are…
-
Il & Fs Financial Services Limited v. Adhunik Meghalaya Steels Private Limited
Whether the Tribunals below were justified in holding that the s.7 application under the IBC filed by the appellant on 15.01.2024 was barred by time; does the entry in the Balance Sheet of F.Y. 2019-20 constitute a…
-
Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee & Ors.
(i) Whether the additional condonable period of 15 days as provided under section 61(2) IBC commences from the end of the prescribed limitation period of 30 days, in case the prescribed limitation period for filing the…
-
Electrosteel Steel Limited (Now M/S Esl Steel Limited) v. Ispat Carrier Private Limited
Whether upon approval of the resolution plan by the NCLT, the claim of the respondent being outside the purview of the resolution plan stood extinguished; whether the arbitral award dated 06.07.2018 was capable of being…
-
Saranga Anilkumar Aggarwal v. Bhavesh Dhirajlal Sheth & Ors.
Whether the execution of penalty orders passed by the NCDRC can be stayed under the interim moratorium provisions of s.96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
-
Independent Sugar Corporation Ltd. v. Girish Sriram Juneja & Ors.
Whether the approval of a proposed combination by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) must mandatorily precede the approval of the Resolution Plan, by the Committee of Creditors (CoC), as stipulated under the…
-
China Development Bank v. Doha Bank Q.P.S.C. & Ors.
Whether the appellants can be classified as ‘Financial Creditors’ within the meaning of s.5(7) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
-
State Bank of India & Ors. v. The Consortium of Mr. Murari Lal Jalan
Whether the Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG) could have been adjusted against the first tranche payment which was to be made under the Resolution Plan, within 180 days from the Effective Date, in contravention of the…
-
GLAS Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran & Ors.
Whether the appellant, who was not a party to the settlement between the second respondent-BCCI (Operational Creditor) and the Corporate Debtor, has locus in the proceedings before this Court; whether the NCLAT erred in…
-
Vidyasagar Prasad v. UCO Bank & Anr.
Whether specific and clear acknowledgement of debt by the Corporate Debtor in its balance sheet is necessary while considering limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
-
State Bank of India v. India Power Corporation Limited
The issue which arises for consideration is the interpretation of Rule 50 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 (NCLT Rules) and Rule 22 of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016 (NCLAT…
-
Cox & Kings Ltd. v. Sap India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Whether the application of the petitioner for the appointment of an arbitrator deserves to be allowed. Whether the requirement of prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, as stipulated u/s. 11 of the Act,…
-
V.S. Palanivel v. P. Sriram, CS, Liquidator, Etc.
(i) Whether the Tribunal was right in accepting the view taken by the Adjudicating Authority that Covid-19 lockdown was a valid reason for extension of time to deposit the balance sale consideration; (ii) Whether the…
-
Brs Ventures Investments Ltd. v. Srei Infrastructure Finance Ltd. & Anr.
Whether the payment of Rs.38.87 crores to the financial creditor under the resolution plan of the corporate guarantor will extinguish the liability of the principal borrower/corporate debtor to pay the entire amount…
-
Global Credit Capital Limited & Anr. v. Sach Marketing Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
(i) Whether there can be debt within the meaning of sub-section (11) of section 5 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; (ii) What is the test to determine whether a debt is a financial debt within the meaning of…
-
Purni Devi & Anr. v. Babu Ram & Anr.
A suit was decreed in favour of plaintiff. Application for execution was filed before the Tehsildar (settlement), Hiranagar on 18.12.2000. The application was rejected on 29.01.2005. The Tehsildar observed that…
-
Sanjay Pandurang Kalate v. Vistra Itcl (India)
Whether appeal instituted before the NCLAT was within limitation. In its impugned order, the NCLAT concluded that the appeal was barred by limitation on the ground that it was instituted beyond the outer limit of 45…
-
Dilip B Jiwrajka v. Union of India & Ors
Constitutional validity of ss.95 to 100 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
-
Tottempudi Salalith v. State Bank of India &
Issues arose as to whether the d ebts in connection with the recovery certificate issued in the year 2015, could form subject matter of an application u/s.7 IBC; whether the the banks having approached the DRT, were…
-
Axis Bank Limited v. Naren Sheth & Anr.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant upholding the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority whereby it admitted the application u/s.7, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 filed by Respondent No.2-Secured…
- Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Raman
- M. Suresh Kumar Reddy v. Canara Bank & Ors.
- M/S Vistra Itcl (India) Ltd v. Mr. Dinkar
- Sanket Kumar Agarwal & Anr v. Apg Logistics Pvt.
- Abhishek Singh v. Huhtamaki Ppl Ltd. & Anr.
- Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka v. Tourism
- Victory Iron Works Ltd. v. Jitendra Lohia & Anr.
- M/S. Shekhar Resorts Limited (Unit of Orient Taj) v. Union of India
- Sabarmati Gas Limited v. Shah Alloys Limited
- Maitreya Doshi v. Anand Rathi Global Finance Ltd. and Anr.
- Ashok G. Rajani v. Beacon Trusteeship Ltd. & Ors
- M/S Tech Sharp Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. Sanghvi Movers Limited
- Essar House Private Limited v. Arcellor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited
- K. Paramasivam v. The Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. & Anr.
- Punjab National Bank v. Mr. Vijay Sitaram Dandnaik & Anr.
- Sundaresh Bhatt, Liquidator of Abg Shipyard v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Kew Precision Parts Private Limited & Ors.
- Sunita Palita & Others v. M/S Panchami Stone Quarry
- Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Tulip Star Hotels Limited & Ors.
- Vidarbha Industries Power Limited v. Axis Bank Limited
- Vallal Rck v. M/S Siva Industries and Holdings Limited and Others
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. A. Balakrishnan & Anr.
- Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority Etc. v. Shakuntla Education and Welfare Society & Ors. Etc.
- Ptc India Financial Services Limited v. Venkateswarlu Kari and Another
- Cox and Kings Limited v. Sap India Private Limited & Another
- Sunil Kumar Jain and Others v. Sundaresh Bhatt and Others
- State Bank of India v. Krishidhan Seeds Private Limited
- Amit Katyal v. Meera Ahuja and Others
- M/S Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v. M/S Hitro Energy Solutions Private Limited
- Devas Multimedia Private Ltd. v. Antrix Corporation Ltd. & Anr
- Devarajan Raman v. Bank of India Limited
- Ngaitlang Dhar v. Panna Pragati Infrastructure Private Limited & Ors.
- E S Krishnamurthy & Ors. v. M/S Bharath Hi Tech Builders Pvt. Ltd.
- Committee of Creditors of Amtek Auto Limited Through Corporation Bank v. Dinkar T. Venkatsubramanian and Others
- Electrosteel Castings Limited v. Uv Asset Reconstruction Company Limited & Ors.
- Rajendra Narottamdas Sheth & Anr. v. Chandra Prakash Jain & Anr.
- National Spot Exchange Limited v. Mr. Anil Kohli, Resolution Professional for Dunar Foods Limited
- Ebix Singapore Private Limited v. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Limited & Anr.
- Dena Bank (Now Bank of Baroda) v. C. Shivakumar Reddy and Anr.
- M/S Orator Marketing Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Samtex Desinz Pvt. Ltd.
- Sandeep Khaitan, Resolution Professional for National Plywood Industries Ltd. v. Jsvm Plywood Industries Ltd. & Anr.
- Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited v. Bishal Jaiswal & Anr.
- Laxmi Pat Surana v. Union Bank of India & Anr.
- Indus Biotech Private Limited v. Kotak India Venture (Offshore) Fund (Earlier Known As Kotak India Venture Limited) & Ors.
- Small Scale Industrial Manufactures Association (Regd.) v. Union of India and Others
- Sesh Nath Singh & Anr. v. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Anr.
- Arun Kumar Jagatramka v. Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. & Anr.
- Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Mr. Amit Gupta & Ors.
- P. Mohanraj & Ors. v. M/S. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.
- A. Navinchandra Steels Private Limited v. Srei Equipment Finance Limited & Ors.
- Committee of Creditors of Amtek Auto Limited Through Corporation Bank v. Dinkar T Venkatasubramanian & Ors.
- M/S. Reliance Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. v. M/S Hotel Poonja International Pvt. Ltd.
- Manish Kumar v. Union of India and Another
- Action Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. v. Shyam Metalics and Energy Ltd.
- M/S Kaledonia Jute and Fibres Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Axis Nirman and Industries Ltd. & Ors.
- The Karad Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. Swwapnil Bhingardevay & Ors.
- M/S. Radha Exports (India) Pvt. Limited v. K.P. Jayaram & Anr.
- Babulal Vardharji Gurjar v. Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
- Maharashtra Seamless Limited v. Padmanabhan Venkatesh & Ors.
- M/S Embassy Property Developments Pvt. Ltd.V. State of Karnataka & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors
- Mr. Anand Rao Korada Resolution Professional v. M/S. Varsha Fabrics (P) Ltd. & Ors.
- Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India Limited Through Authorised Signatory v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors.
- Gaurav Hargovindbhai Dave v. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. & Anr.
- Vashdeo R Bhojwani v. Abhyudaya Co-Operative Bank Ltd & Anr.
- Bikram Chatterji & Ors v. Union of India & Ors.
- Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Jaipur Metals & Electricals Employees Organization Through General Secretary Mr. Tej Ram Meena v. Jaipur Metals & Electricals Ltd. Through Its Managing Director & Ors.
- Chitra Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
- M/S. Innoventive Industrles Ltd. v. Icici Bank & Anr.