Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. · Chapter II: Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
Section 14: Moratorium
(1) Subject to provisions of sub-sections (2) and (3), on the insolvency commencement date, the Adjudicating Authority shall by order declare moratorium for prohibiting all of the following, namely:—
(a) the institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor including execution of any judgment, decree or order in any court of law, tribunal, arbitration panel or other authority;
(b) transferring, encumbering, alienating or disposing of by the corporate debtor any of its assets or any legal right or beneficial interest therein;
(c) any action to foreclose, recover or enforce any security interest created by the corporate debtor in respect of its property including any action under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (54 of 2002);
(d) the recovery of any property by an owner or lessor where such property is occupied by or in the possession of the corporate debtor.
[Explanation.—For the purposes of this sub-section, it is hereby clarified that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, a license, permit, registration, quota, concession, clearances or a similar grant or right given by the Central Government, State Government, local authority, sectoral regulator or any other authority constituted under any other law for the time being in force, shall not be suspended or terminated on the grounds of insolvency, subject to the condition that there is no default in payment of current dues arising for the use or continuation of the license, permit, registration, quota, concession, clearances or a similar grant or right during the moratorium period;]
(2) The supply of essential goods or services to the corporate debtor as may be specified shall not be terminated or suspended or interrupted during moratorium period.
[(2A) Where the interim resolution professional or resolution professional, as the case may be, considers the supply of goods or services critical to protect and preserve the value of the corporate debtor and manage the operations of such corporate debtor as a going concern, then the supply of such goods or services shall not be terminated, suspended or interrupted during the period of moratorium, except where such corporate debtor has not paid dues arising from such supply during the moratorium period or in such circumstances as may be specified;]
[(3) The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply to—
[(a) such transactions, agreements or other arrangements as may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with any financial sector regulator or any other authority;]
(b) a surety in a contract of guarantee to a corporate debtor.].
(4) The order of moratorium shall have effect from the date of such order till the completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process:
Provided that where at any time during the corporate insolvency resolution process period, if the Adjudicating Authority approves the resolution plan under sub-section (1) of section 31 or passes an order for liquidation of corporate debtor under section 33, the moratorium shall cease to have effect from the date of such approval or liquidation order, as the case may be.
Source: India Code (indiacode.gov.in), the consolidated text published by the Legislative Department, Government of India. Text as updated on India Code on 12 September 2026. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 14
-
National Spot Exchange Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
Whether the Secured creditors would have priority of interest over the assets attached under the Provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, (PMLA) and Maharashtra Protection of Investors and Depositors Act,…
-
Rajan Chadha & Anr. v. Sanjay Arora
When one Judge of the same Court has taken a particular view holding the respondent to be guilty of contempt, whether another Judge could have come to a finding that the respondent was not guilty of contempt.
-
Electrosteel Steel Limited (Now M/S Esl Steel Limited) v. Ispat Carrier Private Limited
Whether upon approval of the resolution plan by the NCLT, the claim of the respondent being outside the purview of the resolution plan stood extinguished; whether the arbitral award dated 06.07.2018 was capable of being…
-
Rakesh Bhanot v. M/s. Gurdas Agro Pvt. Ltd.
Issue arose whether the proceedings initiated against the appellants u/s.138 rw s.141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be stayed in view of the interim moratorium u/s.96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code,…
-
Vishnoo Mittal v. M/s Shakti Trading Company
Whether the High Court was justified in relying upon P. Mohan Raj case which held that the immunity granted by the moratorium order issued under Section 14, IBC can only be obtained by a Corporate Debtor and not by a…
-
Saranga Anilkumar Aggarwal v. Bhavesh Dhirajlal Sheth & Ors.
Whether the execution of penalty orders passed by the NCDRC can be stayed under the interim moratorium provisions of s.96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
-
China Development Bank v. Doha Bank Q.P.S.C. & Ors.
Whether the appellants can be classified as ‘Financial Creditors’ within the meaning of s.5(7) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
-
M/s HPCL Bio-Fuels Ltd. v. M/s Shahaji Bhanudas Bhad
(i) Whether a fresh application u/s.11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the respondent could be said to be maintainable more particularly when no liberty to file a fresh application was granted…
-
GLAS Trust Company LLC v. BYJU Raveendran & Ors.
Whether the appellant, who was not a party to the settlement between the second respondent-BCCI (Operational Creditor) and the Corporate Debtor, has locus in the proceedings before this Court; whether the NCLAT erred in…
-
Anish M Rawther @ Anees Mohammed Rawther v. Hafeez Ur Rahman & Ors.
High Court, if justified in directing the trial court to accept the respondent’s memo and pass appropriate order.
-
Global Credit Capital Limited & Anr. v. Sach Marketing Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
(i) Whether there can be debt within the meaning of sub-section (11) of section 5 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; (ii) What is the test to determine whether a debt is a financial debt within the meaning of…
-
Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd v. Hdfc Bank Ltd. & Anr.
Whether the documents executed by the borrower-appellant by which rents were made over to the lender-respondent constituted an assignment and thus fell outside the scope of an a sset and security freeze order made by…
-
Tottempudi Salalith v. State Bank of India &
Issues arose as to whether the d ebts in connection with the recovery certificate issued in the year 2015, could form subject matter of an application u/s.7 IBC; whether the the banks having approached the DRT, were…
- Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Raman
- Abhishek Singh v. Huhtamaki Ppl Ltd. & Anr.
- Ajay Kumar Radheyshyam Goenka v. Tourism
- M/S. Shekhar Resorts Limited (Unit of Orient Taj) v. Union of India
- Essar House Private Limited v. Arcellor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited
- Punjab National Bank v. Mr. Vijay Sitaram Dandnaik & Anr.
- Sundaresh Bhatt, Liquidator of Abg Shipyard v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Kew Precision Parts Private Limited & Ors.
- Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. A. Balakrishnan & Anr.
- Indian Overseas Bank v. M/S Rcm Infrastructure Ltd. and Another
- New Delhi Municipal Council v. Minosha India Limited
- Amit Katyal v. Meera Ahuja and Others
- M/S Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited v. M/S Hitro Energy Solutions Private Limited
- Tata Consultancy Services Limited v. Vishal Ghisulal Jain, Resolution Professional, Sk Wheels Private Limited
- V Nagarajan v. Sks Ispat and Power Ltd.& Ors.
- Ebix Singapore Private Limited v. Committee of Creditors of Educomp Solutions Limited & Anr.
- Anjali Rathi and Others v. Today Homes & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. and Others
- Sandeep Khaitan, Resolution Professional for National Plywood Industries Ltd. v. Jsvm Plywood Industries Ltd. & Anr.
- Sesh Nath Singh & Anr. v. Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Co-Operative Bank Ltd. and Anr.
- Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Mr. Amit Gupta & Ors.
- N. Subramanian v. M/S Aruna Hotels Ltd. & Anr.
- P. Mohanraj & Ors. v. M/S. Shah Brothers Ispat Pvt. Ltd.
- Bengaluru Development Authority v. Mr. Sudhakar Hegde & Ors.
- Mr. Rajendra K. Bhutta v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority Through Its Chairman & Anr.
- M/S Embassy Property Developments Pvt. Ltd.V. State of Karnataka & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors
- Mr. Anand Rao Korada Resolution Professional v. M/S. Varsha Fabrics (P) Ltd. & Ors.
- Forech India Ltd. v. Edelweiss Assets Reconstruction Co. Ltd.
- State Bank of India v. V. Ramakrishnan & Anr.