Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XX: Of Offences Relating to Marriage
Section 495: Same offence with concealment of former marriage from person with whom subsequent marriage is contracted
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
In plain words
Committing the offence in the previous section while hiding the earlier marriage from the new partner is punishable with imprisonment of either description for up to ten years, and a fine.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever commits the offence defined in the last preceding section having concealed from the person with whom the subsequent marriage is contracted, the fact of the former marriage, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 495
-
Chowdamma (D) by Lr and Another v. Venkatappa (D) by Lrs and Another
Issue arose whether the respondents succeeded in establishing a valid marital relationship between their mother and the deceased primarily on the basis of the oral testimony of P.W.2; and whether the relationship…
-
M/s Shri Sendhur Agro & Oil Industries v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Issue arose whether a complaint filed u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, can be ordered to be transferred from one court to the other having territorial jurisdiction to try the offence in exercise of powers…
-
Baba Natarajan Prasad v. M. Revathi
Whether the High Court had shown undeserving leniency and sympathy to accused Nos.1 and 2 by sentencing them to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- each, even after finding…
-
Revanasiddappa & Anr. v. Mallikarjun & Ors.
Whether a child who is conferred with legislative legitimacy u/s. 16(1) or 16(2) is, by reason of s. 16(3), of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 entitled to the ancestral/coparcenary property of the parents or is the child…
- Rana Ayyub v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Musstt Rehana Begum v. State of Assam & Anr.
- Joseph Shine v. Union of India
- Sunil v. Sakshi @ Shweta & Anr.
- Deoki Panjhiyara v. Shashi Bhushan Narayan Azad & Anr.
- Lee Kun Hee & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- A. Subash Babu v. State of A.P.& Anr.
- Raj Kumar Khurana v. State of (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
- Lily Thomas, Etc. Etc v. Union of India and Ors.
- Gopal Lal v. State of Rajasthan
- Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.