Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XX: Of Offences Relating to Marriage
Section 494: Marrying again during life-time of husband or wife
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
In plain words
Marrying again while one's husband or wife is alive, where the new marriage is void for that reason, is punishable with imprisonment of either description for up to seven years, and a fine.
- This does not apply if a competent court has declared the earlier marriage void.
- It also does not apply if the earlier spouse has been continuously absent and not heard of for seven years, provided the new partner is told the facts before the marriage.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such husband or wife, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Exception.—This section does not extend to any person whose marriage with such husband or wife has been declared void by a Court of competent jurisdiction, nor to any person who contracts a marriage during the life of a former husband or wife, if such husband or wife, at the time of the subsequent marriage, shall have been continually absent from such person for the space of seven years, and shall not have been heard of by such person as being alive within that time provided the person contracting such subsequent marriage shall, before such marriage takes place, inform the person with whom such marriage is contracted of the real state of facts so far as the same are within his or her knowledge.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 494
-
Chowdamma (D) by Lr and Another v. Venkatappa (D) by Lrs and Another
Issue arose whether the respondents succeeded in establishing a valid marital relationship between their mother and the deceased primarily on the basis of the oral testimony of P.W.2; and whether the relationship…
-
Madduri Gangaraju @ Babu Rao v. Madduri Sunanda & Others
Whether the criminal proceedings filed against the appellants in-laws by respondent No.1-wife subsequent to the dissolution of the marriage between her and her husband and also when both the parties had agreed for an…
-
M/s Shri Sendhur Agro & Oil Industries v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Issue arose whether a complaint filed u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, can be ordered to be transferred from one court to the other having territorial jurisdiction to try the offence in exercise of powers…
-
Smt. N. Usha Rani and Anr. v. Moodudula Srinivas
Whether a woman is entitled to claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC from her second husband while her first marriage is allegedly legally subsisting.
-
Baba Natarajan Prasad v. M. Revathi
Whether the High Court had shown undeserving leniency and sympathy to accused Nos.1 and 2 by sentencing them to undergo imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- each, even after finding…
-
Aniruddha Khanwalkar v. Sharmila Das & Others
Whether it is sufficient to make out prima facie case on the basis of allegations for summoning of the accused.
-
Revanasiddappa & Anr. v. Mallikarjun & Ors.
Whether a child who is conferred with legislative legitimacy u/s. 16(1) or 16(2) is, by reason of s. 16(3), of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 entitled to the ancestral/coparcenary property of the parents or is the child…
- Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan
- Rana Ayyub v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Musstt Rehana Begum v. State of Assam & Anr.
- Sivasankaran v. Santhimeenal
- Samir Agrawal v. Competition Commission of India & Ors.
- Kamala and Others v. M.R. Mohan Kumar
- Joseph Shine v. Union of India
- Basisth Narayan Yadav v. Kailash Rai and Ors.
- Ravinder Kaur v. Anil Kumar
- Sunil v. Sakshi @ Shweta & Anr.
- Bad Shah v. Sou.Urmila Badshah Goose & Anr
- Deoki Panjhiyara v. Shashi Bhushan Narayan Azad & Anr.
- Vishwanath S/O Sitaram Agrawal v. Sau. Sarla Vishwanath Agrawal
- Rameshbhai Dabhai Naika v. State of Gujarat & Others
- A. Subash Babu v. State of A.P.& Anr.
- Lal Kishore Jha v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha & Anr.
- K. Neelaveni v. State Rep. by Insp. of Police and Ors.
- Pashaura Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- Manju Ram Kalita v. State of Assam
- Koppisetti Subbharao @ Subramanlam v. State of A.P.
- Priya Vrat Singh & Ors. v. Shyam Ji Sahai
- Tarakanath Kar v. Lipika Kar
- Ram Abhilakh v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- Sujata Uday Patil v. Uday Madhukar Patil
- Sarwan Kumar and Anr. v. Madan Lal Aggarwal
- S. Nagalingam v. Sivagami
- Dr. Surajmani Stella Kujur v. Durga Charan Hansdah and Anr.
- Jatinder Singh v. Ranjit Kaur
- Lily Thomas, Etc. Etc v. Union of India and Ors.
- Rameshw Ari Devi v. State of Bihar
- Velamuri Venkata Sivaprasad (Dead) by L.Rs. v. Kothuri Venkateswarlu (Dead) by L.Rs. and Ors.
- Dwarika Prasad Satpathy v. Bidyut Prava Dixit and Anr.
- Rajathi v. C. Ganesan
- Arun Vyas and Anr. v. Anita Vyas
- Ashok Hurra v. Rupa Bipin Zaveri
- Ahmedabad Women Action Group and Ors. Etc. v. Union of India
- State of Orissa v. Sharat Chandra Sahu and Anr.
- The State of Karnataka and Anr. v. T. Venkataramanappa
- M/S. Gujarat Machinery Manufacturers Ltd. v. Collector, Central Excise, Baroda.
- P. Satyanarayana and Anr. v. P. Mallaiah and Ors.
- Smt. Sarla Mudgal, President, Kalyani and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
- Smt. Laxmi Devi v. Satya Narayan and Ors.
- Jeet Singh Etc. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
- Smt. Chand Dhawan v. Jawahar Lal and Ors.
- Mohinder Singh v. Gulwant Singh and Ors. Etc.