Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XIV: Of Offences Affecting the Public Health, Safety, Convenience, Decency and Morals
Section 279: Rash driving or riding on a public way
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
Whoever drives any vehicle, or rides, on any public way in a manner so rash or negligent as to endanger human life, or to be likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 279
-
Hanumantharaju B (Dead) by LR. v. M Akram Pasha & Anr.
Whether it would be just and proper, in the instant case, to accept 78% disability as assessed by the Tribunal appointed Commissioner; whether any amount receivable on account of PF, pension or insurance be deducted…
-
Sanjay Colaro v. State of Karnataka
Matter pertains to the extension of benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 to the appellant for causing a road accident, resulting in the death of the pedestrian.
-
Sachin Yallappa Usulkar & Ors. v. Vijayata & Ors.
Whether the impugned judgment and order passed by the Courts below warrant any interference in so far as the award of compensation is concerned. Whether appellant no.2, who was minor at the time of incident, was…
-
K.S. Muralidhar v. R. Subbulakshmi & Anr.
Matter pertains to the enhancement of compensation towards pain and suffering for a motor accident victim having suffered 100% disability.
-
Chandramani Nanda v. Sarat Chandra Swain and Another
Appellant-claimant, if entitled to enhancement of compensation.
- Mathew Alexander v. Mohammed Shafi and Anr.
- State of Punjab v. Dil Bahadur
- Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Dilip Uttam Jayabhay
- Surendran v. Sub-Inspector of Police
- Sunil Kumar @ Sudhir Kumar & Anr. v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pearl Beverages Ltd.
- Kirti & Anr. Etc. v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
- The State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Heem Singh
- Pappu Deo Yadav v. Naresh Kumar and Ors.
- United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur & Ors.
- Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Mukesh Poonamchand Shah
- The State of Arunachal Pradesh v. Ramchandra Rabidas @ Ratan Rabidas & Anr.
- Thangasamy v. The State of Tamil Nadu
- Sunita & Ors. v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & Anr.
- Gagan Kumar v. The State of Punjab
- State of Uttar Pradesh Through Prinicipal Secretary & Ors v. All U.P. Consumer Protection Bar Association
- Mohar Sai and Anr. v. Gayatri Devi and Ors.
- Shivawwa and Anr v. The Branch Manager, National India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anr.
- M/S. Elite Engineering and Construction (Hyd.) Private Limited Rep. by Its Managing Director v. M/S. Teachtrans Construction India Private Limited Rep. by Its Managing Director
- Anil & Ors v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Ors
- Halappa v. Malik Sab
- Nikesh Tarachand Shah v. Union of India & Anr.
- Rakesh Kumar & Etc. Etc. v. United India Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors. Etc. Etc.
- State of Punjab v. Saurabh Bakshi
- State of Himachal Pradesh v. Ram Pal