Indian Penal Code, 1860 · Chapter XIV: Of Offences Affecting the Public Health, Safety, Convenience, Decency and Morals
Section 272: Adulteration of food or drink intended for sale
The Indian Penal Code, 1860 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
Adulterating food or drink so as to make it harmful, intending or knowing it likely to be sold as food or drink, is punishable with imprisonment of either description for up to six months, or a fine of up to one thousand rupees, or both.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
Whoever adulterates any article of food or drink, so as to make such article noxious as food or drink, intending to sell such article as food or drink, or knowing it to be likely that the same will be sold as food or drink, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 272
- Anshul Bansal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
-
Ram Nath v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Interplay between the provisions of Chapter IX of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA) and ss.272 and 273 of the Penal Code, 1860; whether the view taken by the Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. Pepsico…
- The State of Arunachal Pradesh v. Ramchandra Rabidas @ Ratan Rabidas & Anr.
- The State of Uttar Pradesh v. Aman Mittal & Anr.
- Delhi Administration v. Vidya Gupta
- Swami Achyutanand Tirth & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar v. State of Gujarat
- Rakesh Kapoor v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- Food Inspector, Ernakulam and Anr. v. P.S. Sreenivasa Shenoy
- P.N. Krishna Lal and Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Govt. of Kerala and Anr. Etc. Etc.
- Joseph Kurien Philip Jose v. State of Kerala
- Jagdish Prasad Alias Jagdish Prasad Gupta v. State of West Bengal