Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · Chapter V: Of Documentary Evidence
Section 67: Proof of signature and handwriting of person alleged to have signed or written document produced
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
If a document is alleged to have been signed or written wholly or partly by a person, the signature or handwriting of that part must be proved to be theirs.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
If a document is alleged to be signed or to have been written wholly or in part by any person, the signature or the handwriting of so much of the document as is alleged to be in that person’s handwriting must be proved to be in his handwriting.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 67
-
Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. Lrs. v. Suresh Chand and Anr.
I) Whether the impugned documents, i.e., Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, Receipt of Consideration and the registered Will, allegedly entered into by K, father of the appellant/ defendant no.1 and…
-
Lalita v. Vishwanath & Ors.
Matter pertains to the correctness of the order passed by the High Court acquitting the respondents for the offence punishable u/ss.306, 498A, and 34 IPC; and incase the first informant dies before stepping into the…
- Rajendri Devi & Ors v. Union of India & Anr
- Parivar Seva v. Vivek Malhotra
- Marie Stops Int., v. Parivar Seva Sanstha
- Mrs Sharda Relan v. State & Ors
- Damodhar Narayan Saw Ale (D) Through Lrs. v. Shri
- Harjeet Kaur & Anr v. State & Ors
- Om Prakash Popli and Ors v. Raj Kumari Batra and Ors
- Shri Bharat Gupta v. State and Others
- Manik Majumder and Others v. Dipak Kumar Saha
- Neeraj Dutta v. State (Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi)
- Shivakumar & Ors. v. Sharanabasappa & Ors.
- Chhotanben and Anr. v. Kiritbhai Jalkrushnabhai Thakkar and Ors.
- Sonu@Amar v. State of Haryana
- B. Venkatamuni v. C.J.Yodhya Ram Singh and Ors.
- State Through Inspector of Police, A.P. v. K. Narasimhachary
- N. Kamalam (Dead) and Anr. v. Ayyasamy and Anr.
- Guljar Ali Etc. v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- S. Gopal Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B. N. Thimmajamma & Others