Indian Evidence Act, 1872 · Chapter V: Of Documentary Evidence
Section 65A: Special provisions as to evidence relating to electronic record
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
In plain words
The contents of electronic records can be proved in accordance with section 65B.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
The contents of electronic records may be proved in accordance with the provisions of section 65B.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 65A
-
Intelligence v. Suresh Kumar and Co. Impex Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Whether the CESTAT erred in passing the impugned order setting aside the penalty imposed upon the respondents-assessees.
-
Ravinder Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
1) Whether circumstantial evidence is sufficient to convict the accused; 2) Whether burden of proof u/s. 106 Evidence Act can be on accused before the prosecution proves its case; 3) Whether recovery pursuant to…
-
State of Karnataka v. T. Naseer @ Nasir @ Thandiantavida
The High Court rejected the applications filed by the prosecution u/s. 311 of the Cr.P.C., seeking recall of PW-189 and to permit the prosecution to produce the report and the certificate u/s. 65B of the Evidence Act,…
- Sundar @ Sundarrajan v. State by Inspector of
- Mohd. Arif @ Ashfaq v. State (Nct of Delhi)
- Ravinder Singh @ Kaku v. State of Punjab
- Arjun Panditrao Khotkar v. Kailash Kushanrao Gorantyal and Ors.
- Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr v. Mohd. Parvez Abdul Kayuum Etc
- Shafhi Mohammad v. The State of Himachal Pradesh
- Vikram Singh @ Vicky Walia and Anr. v. State of Punjab and Anr.
- Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer and Ors.
- In Re: Gang Rape on Orders of Community Panchayat v. In Re: Gang Rape on Orders of Community Panchayat
- State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu@Afsan Guru