Consumer Protection Act, 1986 · Chapter III: Consumer Disputes Redressal Agencies
Section 17: Jurisdiction of the State Commission
The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 was repealed and replaced by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 from 20 July 2020. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
[(1)] Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the State Commission shall have jurisdiction—
(a) to entertain—
(i) complaints where the value of the goods or services and compensation, if any, claimed [exceeds rupees twenty lakhs but does not exceed rupees one crore]; and
(ii) appeals against the orders of any District Forum within the State; and
(b) to call for the records and pass appropriate orders in any consumer dispute which is pending before or has been decided by any District Forum within the State, where it appears to the State Commission that such District Forum has exercised a jurisdiction not vested in it by law, or has failed to exercise a jurisdiction so vested or has acted in exercise of its jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity. [(2) A complaint shall be instituted in a State Commission within the limits of whose jurisdiction,—
(a) the opposite party or each of the opposite parties, where there are more than one, at the time of the institution of the complaint, actually and voluntarily resides or carries on business or has a branch office or personally works for gain; or
(b) any of the opposite parties, where there are more than one, at the time of the institution of the complaint, actually and voluntarily resides, or carries on business or has a branch office or personally works for gain, provided that in such case either the permission of the State Commission is given or the opposite parties who do not reside or carry on business or have a branch office or personally works for gain, as the case may be, acquiesce in such institution; or
(c) the cause of action, wholly or in part, arises.]
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 17
- Rakesh Khanna v. Naveen Kumar Aggarwal & Ors
-
Akshay & Anr. v. Aditya & Ors.
Appellants-landowners executed a Joint Venture Agreement and an irrevocable power of attorney in favour of the Respondent No.2-builder for the development of the land and construction of flats. Respondent No.2 entered…
- M/S Universal Sompo General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Suresh Chand Jain & Anr.
- Apollo Multispeciality Hospital Ltd Earlier Known As Apollo Gleneagles Hospital v. Madan Murari Varma and Ors
- Iffco Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pearl Beverages Ltd.
- Bank of India v. M/S. Brindavan Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd.
- Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. v. Sanjay Dalia&Anr.
- M/S Shreenath Corp. & Ors. v. Consumer Education & Research Society & Ors.
- Sonic Surgical v. National Insurance Company Ltd.
- New Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Shri B.N. Sainani