Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XII: Information to the Police and Their Powers to Investigate
Section 172: Diary of proceedings in investigation
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to offences and proceedings from before that date.
(1) Every police officer making an investigation under this Chapter shall day by day enter his proceedings in the investigation in a diary, setting forth the time at which the information reached him, the time at which he began and closed his investigation, the place or places visited by him, and a statement of the circumstances ascertained through his investigation. [(1A) The statements of witnesses recorded during the course of investigation under section 161 shall be inserted in the case diary.
(1B) The diary referred to in sub-section (1) shall be a volume and duly paginated.]
(2) Any Criminal Court may send for the police diaries of a case under inquiry or trial in such Court, and may use such diaries, not as evidence in the case, but to aid it in such inquiry or trial.
(3) Neither the accused nor his agents shall be entitled to call for such diaries, nor shall he or they be entitled to see them merely because they are referred to by the Court; but, if they are used by the police officer who made them to refresh his memory, or if the Court uses them for the purpose of contradicting such police officer, the provisions of section 161 or section 145, as the case may be, of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), shall apply.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 172
-
K.P. Tamilmaran v. The State by Deputy Superintendent of Police
Whether the High Court was justified in upholding the conviction and sentence of A-15 under Sections 217, 218, Penal Code, 1860 and ss.3(2)(i), 4, SC/ST Act, 1989 and modifying the conviction and sentence of A-14, while…
-
Dablu Kujur v. The State of Jharkhand
The issue for consideration was the compliance of the requirements of a Police Report under Section 173(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
-
Shailesh Kumar v. State of U.P. (Now State of Uttarakhand)
What is the goal of investigation and what is the role of investigating officer; Are s.172 CrPC and ss. 145 & 161 of the Evidence Act to be read in consonance with each other; Can a General Diary entry precede the…
-
Munna Pandey v. State of Bihar
Whether the High Court erred in confirming the conviction and death sentence passed by trial court against appellant-accused for offences punishable u/ss.302, 376, IPC and s.4, POCSO Act, 2012, despite serious lapses in…
- Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu
- P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Balakram v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors.
- Sheikh Juman & Anr. Etc. v. State of Blhar
- State of Haryana v. Ram Mehar & Others Etc. Etc.
- Gajoo v. State of Uttarakhand
- Md. Ankoos & Ors. v. The Public Prosecutor, H!Gh Court of A.P.
- Babubhai Jamnadas Patel v. State Od Gujarat & Ors.
- Bachan Singh & Anr. v. State of Bihar
- State of NCT of Delhi v. Ravi Kant Sharma and Ors.
- M.C.Mehta v. Union of India and Ors.
- Jagdish Murav v. State of U.P. and Ors.
- Budh Singh and Ors. v. State of U.P.
- Mohd. Yousuf v. Smt. Afaq Jahan and Anr.
- Sidharth Etc. Etc. v. State of Bihar
- Mahabir Singh v. State of Haryana
- State of Kerala v. Babu and Ors.
- Shamshul Kanwar v. State of U.P.
- Director, Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors. v. Niyamavedi Represented by Its Member K. Nandini, Advocate and Ors.
- E.K. Chandrasenan Etc. Etc. v. State of Kerala