Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XII: Information to the Police and Their Powers to Investigate
Section 164A: Medical examination of the victim of rape
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
During investigation of rape or attempted rape, the woman can be medically examined, with her consent or that of a person competent to consent for her, by a registered medical practitioner at a government or local authority hospital, or another practitioner if none is available. She must be sent within twenty-four hours of the information.
- The report must record her name, address, age, material taken for DNA profiling, injuries, mental condition, reasons for each conclusion, that consent was obtained, and the exact start and end times.
- It is sent without delay to the investigating officer, who forwards it to the Magistrate.
- No examination without consent is lawful.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) Where, during the stage when an offence of committing rape or attempt to commit rape is under investigation, it is proposed to get the person of the woman with whom rape is alleged or attempted to have been committed or attempted, examined by a medical expert, such examination shall be conducted by a registered medical practitioner employed in a hospital run by the Government or a local authority and in the absence of such a practitioner, by any other registered medical practitioner, with the consent of such woman or of a person competent to give such consent on her behalf and such woman shall be sent to such registered medical practitioner within twenty-four hours from the time of receiving the information relating to the commission of such offence.
(2) The registered medical practitioner, to whom such woman is sent, shall, without delay, examine her person and prepare a report of his examination giving the following particulars, namely:—
(i) the name and address of the woman and of the person by whom she was brought;
(ii) the age of the woman;
(iii) the description of material taken from the person of the woman for DNA profiling;
(iv) marks of injury, if any, on the person of the woman;
(v) general mental condition of the woman; and
(vi) other material particulars in reasonable detail.
(3) The report shall state precisely the reasons for each conclusion arrived at.
(4) The report shall specifically record that the consent of the woman or of the person competent to give such consent on her behalf to such examination had been obtained.
(5) The exact time of commencement and completion of the examination shall also be noted in the report.
(6) The registered medical practitioner shall, without delay forward the report to the investigating officer who shall forward it to the Magistrate referred to in section 173 as part of the documents referred to in clause (a) of sub-section (5) of that section.
(7) Nothing in this section shall be construed as rendering lawful any examination without the consent of the woman or of any person competent to give such consent on her behalf. 1. Ins. by Act 13 of 2013, s. 16 (w.e.f. 13-3-2013). 2. Subs. by Act 22 of 2018, s. 13, for —section 376A, section 376B, section 376C, section 376D‖ (w.e.f. 22-4-2018). 3. Ins. by Act 25 of 2005, s. 17 (w.e.f. 23-6-2006).
Explanation.—For the purposes of this section, "examination" and "registered medical practitioner" shall have the same meanings as in section 53.]
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 164A
- Maksood Ahmad v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
- Dinganglung Gangmei v. Mutum Churamani Meetei
- The State of Jammu & Kashmir (Now U.T. of Jammu & Kashmir) & Ors. v. Shubam Sangra
- The State of Maharashtra & Anr. v. Dr. Maroti S/O Kashinath Pimpalkar
- Chotkau v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- Miss ‘A v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr.
- Rajendra Pralhadrao Wasnik v. State of Maharashtra
- Ms. Eera Through Dr. Manjula Krippendorf v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
- Ag v. Shiv Kumar Yadav &Anr.
- Rashmi Behl v. State of U.P. & Ors.
- State of Karnataka by Nonavinakere Police v. Shivanna @ Tarkari Shivanna