Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 · Chapter XII: Information to the Police and Their Powers to Investigate
Section 160: Police officer‘s power to require attendance of witnesses
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still applies to matters and proceedings from before that date, as the repealing law provides.
In plain words
An investigating police officer can, by written order, require a person in their or an adjoining station area who appears to know the facts to appear before them, and the person must attend.
- A male under fifteen years of age or over sixty-five years of age, a woman, or a mentally or physically disabled person cannot be required to attend anywhere other than where they live.
- The State Government can provide for reimbursing reasonable expenses of those attending elsewhere.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) Any police officer making an investigation under this Chapter may, by order in writing, require the attendance before himself of any person being within the limits of his own or any adjoining station who, from the information given or otherwise, appears to be acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case; and such person shall attend as so required:
Provided that no male person [under the age of fifteen years or above the age of sixty-five years or a woman or a mentally or physically disabled person] shall be required to attend at any place other than the place in which such male person or woman resides.
(2) The State Government may, by rules made in this behalf, provide for the payment by the police officer of the reasonable expenses of every person, attending under sub-section (1) at any place other than his residence.
Corresponding sections were matched by comparing the wording of both official texts, and for the IPC and BNS, also against a published correspondence table. Wording, punishments and structure often changed, so read both sections before relying on the match.
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 160
-
G.V. Adhimoolam & Ors. v. The Inspector of Police & Anr.
Matter pertains to the sustainability of the order passed by the High Court rejecting the petition of the appellants seeking quashing of complaint against them.
-
Amit Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
(i) What is the scope of section 174 CrPC and how is it different from investigation pursuant to filing of FIR under section 154 CrPC. (ii) Whether recourse to inquest proceedings under Section 174 of the CrPC by the…
-
Arvind Kejriwal v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The instant appeals are directed against the judgments and orders dated 05.08.2024 passed by the High Court, dismissing the appellant’s challenge to his arrest being illegal as well as his application for the grant of…
-
Abhishek Banerjee & Anr. v. Directorate of Enforcement
Matter pertains to seeking quashing of the summons issued to the appellants by the Enforcement Directorate, seeking their personal appearance in New Delhi with the documents sought for, pertaining to the FIR registered…
- Arvind Kejriwal v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Shri Pradeep Koneru v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr
- Kalvakuntla Kavitha v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Ajay Ramesh Chandra Nawandar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- Defsys Solutions Private Limited & Anr v. Union of India
- Awaneesh Chandra Jha v. State NCT of Delhi
- Tata Aig General Insurance Company Ltd v. Smt. Preeti Wife of Deceased & Ors
- M/S National Insurance Company Ltd v. Hema Devi & Ors
- Mater Dei School Through Sister Sheeba Antony Secretary Society of the Franciscan Sisters of Mary D v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
- Lakhan Singh & Anr v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr
- Defsys Solutions Private Limited v. Union of India
- Union of India v. Defsys Solutions Private Limited
- Moloy Ghatak v. Directorate of Enforcement
- Shashi Kant Gupta v. State Through Incharge Economic Office Wigh Section Vii
- Akshy Gupta v. State Through Incharge Economic Offence Wing
- State v. Nikhil Rana & Ors
- Nikhil Rana v. State
- Sanjay Kumar v. State & Ors
- Suneetha Narreddy v. Y S Avinash Reddy & Anr.
- Ravinder Solanki v. State
- Sanjeet Kumar Singh @ Munna Kumar Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh
- Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- State of West Bengal v. Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Singh
- Bureau of Investigation (Cbi) and Anr. v. Thommandru Hannah Vijayalakshmi @ T. H. Vijayalakshmi and Anr.
- Vinod Dua v. Union of India & Ors.
- Charansingh v. State of Maharashtra and Others
- Arnab Ranjan Goswami v. Union of India and Ors.
- Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel v. State of Gujarat and Another
- Bikash Ranjan Rout v. State Through the Secretary (Home) Government of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi
- The State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Tasneem Rizwan Siddiquee
- Dinubhai Boghabhai Solanki v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
- Sanjiv Rajendra Bhatt v. Union of India & Ors.
- Mohd. Haroon & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
- Gulabrao Baburao Deokar v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- Bakhshish Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- Shantibhai J. Vaghela and Anr. v. State of Gujarat and Ors.
- Sadhwi Pragyna Singh Thakur v. State. of Maharashtra
- Onkar Nath Mishra & Ors. v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
- Kamalanantha and Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu
- State Rep. by Inspector of Police and Ors. v. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate
- M/S. Swil Ltd. v. State of Delhi and Anr.
- Nandini Satpathy v. Dani (P.L.) and Anr.