- Court
- High Court of Uttarakhand
- Decided
- 31 December 2025
- Bench
- Ravindra Maithani
- Case no.
- WPMS 3687/2025
Follow Uttarakhand High CourtFollow Ravindra Maithani
Judgment
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3648 of 2025
Sukhvindar Kaur and others
..........Petitioners
State of Uttarakhand and others
.......….Respondents
Mr. Atul Kumar Bansal, Advocate for the petitioners.
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3655 of 2025
Kailashi
........Petitioner
District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar and another ….Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3687 of 2025
Jit Singh Negi
...Petitioner
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3688 of 2025
Hayat Singh
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3689 of 2025
Pratap Singh Panwar
...Petitioner
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3692 of 2025
Ram Singh
..........Petitioner
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3693 of 2025
Rakesh Singh
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3694 of 2025
Smt. Bhagwati Devi
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3697 of 2025
Bhupendra Singh
.............Petitioner
District Magistrate and another
......….Respondents
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3698 of 2025
Shiv Singh
................Petitioner
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3699 of 2025
Khim Singh
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3700 of 2025
Gajram Singh
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3701 of 2025
Bhopal Singh
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3703 of 2025
Babu Ram
..........Petitioner
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3704 of 2025
Kuldeep Singh
.........Petitioner
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3705 of 2025
Kirti Singh
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3706 of 2025
Ram Prasad
........Petitioner
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3707 of 2025
Baldev Singh
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3708 of 2025
Hardeep Singh
..........Petitioner
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3709 of 2025
Smt. Rama Devi
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3710 of 2025
Mahaveer
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3711 of 2025
Veerpal Singh
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3712 of 2025
Tarsem Singh
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3713 of 2025
Smt. Prema Devi alias Prem Devi
.........Petitioner
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3714 of 2025
Manjeet Singh Rawat
Writ Petition (M/S) No.3725 of 2025
Baljit Singh
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)
Since common question of law and facts are involved in all these petitions, they are heard together and decided by this common judgment.
2.
The petitioners seek direction to the respondents to get their names mutated over the ceiling land.
3.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that identical controversy has already been decided by this Court on 16.12.2025, in WPMS No. 3367 of 2025, Anup Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others and connected petitions and the petitioners in those petitions have been directed to make separate application to the District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar.
5.
Learned counsel for the respondents admits this fact.
6.
Since the identical issue has already been decided by this Court on 16.12.2025 in the case of Anup Singh (supra), all these
petitions are decided in terms of judgment dated 16.12.2025 passed in the case of Anup Singh (supra).
7.
Accordingly, the petitioners are given liberty to make separate application(s) to District Magistrate, Udham Singh Nagar, for correcting of the provision invoked for allotting land to them. If such representation(s) is made within two weeks from today, District Magistrate shall examine the matter and pass appropriate order, within eight weeks thereafter. Stake holders, if any, shall also be heard while taking any decision in the matters.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
31.12.2025 Avneet/
Source: High Court of Uttarakhand, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.