Shiv Asray Sharma v. State of Uttarakhand

I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

1 5 TH DECEMBER, 2 0 2 5

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.1 2 2 3 of 2 0 2 5

Shiv Asray Sharma

.....Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Another ..…Respondents

Counsel for the Applicant

: Mr. Siddhartha Sah,

Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Brief

Holder.

Hon 'ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a,J.

This Application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.75 of 2025, registered at Police Station Nehru Colony, District Dehradun under Section 409 and Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. 2 .

According to the First Information Report dated 22.02.2025, the allegations against the present applicant are that he along with co-accused had spent the amount in some other work inspite of spending on the work allotted by the Uttar Pradesh Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd., due to which, the department has suffered a loss of Rs.10,971.65/ - lakh.

3 .

Heard Mr. Siddhartha Sah, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the respondent. 4 .

Mr. Siddhartha Sah, Advocate, contended that the applicant was posted on the post of Additional Project Manager in Dehradun unit of the informant, the Uttar Pradesh Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd. The informant has lodged the First Information Report against the present applicant and three other employees. It was a routine practice in the working of Nigam that for the immediate need in other work, if the required amount is not received, the amounts were utilized in the other work, therefore, no loss was caused to the Nigam. The applicant, now aged about years, was superannuated on 31.08.2018. He is residing in Dehradun District. He is not a convicted person. Ram Prakash Gupta, the co-accused of similar role, has already been granted Anticipatory Bail by this Court in Anticipatory Bail Application No.402 of 2025. 5 .

Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder, has opposed the anticipatory bail application orally. 6 .

Personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is very precious fundamental right and it should be curtailed only when it becomes

imperative according to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case. 7 .

Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present Application, filed for anticipatory bail, is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant Shiv Asray Sharma, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of Rs. 30,000/ -and two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer, subject to the following conditions: -

(i) Applicant shall cooperate with the

Investigating Agency and he shall make

himself available for interrogation by a police

officer as and when required;

(ii) If the charge-sheet is filed, the applicant

shall attend the trial court regularly and he shall

not seek any unnecessary adjournment;

(iii) Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make

any inducement, threat or promise to any person,

acquainted with the facts of this case;

(iv) Applicant shall not leave the country without

the previous permission of the trial court.

8 .

It is made clear that if the applicant misuses or violates any of the conditions, imposed upon him, the prosecution agency will be free to move the Court for cancellation of the anticipatory bail.

_ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _

ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.

Dt: 15.12.2025 Neha

NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,

2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e 9a4a8038ee7326b08b2dtie018b01 be753f014836d27, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB96 77068452F32DE6BA960BFE64D81 9EE44CA9CCE487B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.12.15 18:23:53 +05'30'