VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Uttarakhand High Court 2026 › High Court of Uttarakhand

Aabad Malik v. State of Uttarakhand

DISPOSED
Court
High Court of Uttarakhand
Decided
27 July 2026
Bench
Alok Mahraauthor
Case no.
ABA 526/2023

Follow Uttarakhand High CourtFollow Alok Mahra

Judgment

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar's order with Signatures COURT'S OR JUDGE'S ORDERS

ABA/526/2023

Aabad Malik and Others --Applicants Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Susheel Kumar, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicants.

Mr. Pramod Tiwari, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

¶2By means of the present application, the applicants seek grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Case Crime No. 276 of 2023, registered at Police Station Bhadrabad, District Haridwar, for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the investigation has since been concluded and the charge-sheet has been filed only against applicant nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, whereas no incriminating material has been found against applicant no. 5, who has consequently been exonerated during the course of investigation.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicants further submits that no material has been brought on record by the prosecution to demonstrate that the custodial interrogation of applicant nos. 1 to 4 is either necessary or warranted at this stage after submission of the charge-sheet. It is further submitted that although certain additional penal provisions have subsequently been incorporated, the

applicants were never arrested during the course of investigation. It is, therefore, prayed that anticipatory bail be granted to applicant nos. 1 to 4.

¶5Learned State Counsel, on instructions, does not dispute the aforesaid factual position and has no objection to the prayer made on behalf of applicant nos. 1 to 4.

¶6Having heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the material available on record, and considered the rival submissions, this Court finds that the investigation has culminated in the submission of the charge-sheet only against applicant nos. 1 to 4, whereas applicant no. 5 has been exonerated during the course of investigation as no incriminating material has been found against him. It is also not the case of the prosecution that the custodial interrogation of applicant nos. 1 to 4 is required at this stage. Significantly, despite the filing of the charge-sheet and the subsequent addition of certain penal provisions, applicant nos. 1 to 4 were never arrested during the course of investigation. This circumstance clearly indicates that their custodial interrogation is not considered necessary by the investigating agency. Having regard to the nature of the allegations, the stage of the proceedings, and the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the prosecution case, this Court is of the considered opinion that applicant nos. 1 to 4 have made out a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶7Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is allowed in respect of applicant nos. 1 to 4.

¶8In the event of arrest, applicant nos. 1 to 4 shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each with two reliable sureties of the

like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.

¶9Insofar as applicant no. is concerned, in view of his exoneration during the course of investigation and no charge-sheet having been submitted against him, no further orders are required to be passed in the present anticipatory bail application. Accordingly, the application, insofar as it relates to applicant no. 5, stands disposed of.

(Alok Mahra, J.) 27-07-2026 SB

SHIKSHA BINJOLA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND,

2.5.4.20=3410ef86ae41ec9fbabcd5dba6b3a2c24b5aa08b09c12f21822fbd40bf639b1c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=FD80A2D028949381C52796A542D7FF0A9BED00E67B5283D205F18FE29 BDF5DD9, cn=SHIKSHA BINJOLA Date: 2026.07.28 16:07:17 +05'30'

Source: High Court of Uttarakhand, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.