Kulveer Singh v. Bachan Singh

SL. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar's order with Signatures COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS

WPMS No. 334 of 2022 Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.

Mr. Anil K. Bisht, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. A.M. Saklani, Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Ms. Archita Badoni, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. V.K. Kaparuwan, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

By the impugned revisional order passed by the Board of Revenue, which has been preferred against the order which was passed under Section 229-D of the Zamindari Abolition Act, the Board of Revenue has passed the following orders :-

"िनगरानी ˢीकार की जाती है एवं इस ्ቅ म मŐ पƗकारों को वाद्ቇˑ भूिम के अȶरण अथवा तृतीय पƗ का िहत सृिजत करने से िनिषȠ िकया जाता है तथा वाद्ቇˑ भूिम पर मूल वाद के िनˑारण तक यथाİ˕ित बनाये रखने के आदेश िदये जाते हœ। आƗेिपत आदेश िदनांक

22.06.2021 जो Ɋायालय आयुƅ गढ़वाल मǷल पौड़ी Ȫारा अपील संƥा -3 / 2020-21 बचन िसंह बनाम कुलबीर िसंह आिद एवं आदेश िदनांक

10.03.2021 जो Ɋायालय सहायक कलेƃर ঋथम ঒ेणी बारह˟ूं, जनपद पौड़ी वाद संƥा-1 / 2020-21 बचन िसंह बनाम कुलबीर िसंह आिद मŐ पाįरत िकये गये हœ , िनरˑ िकये जाते हœ।

Ɋायालय सहायक कलेƃर ঋथम ঒ेणी, बारह˟ूं जनपद पौड़ी वाद संƥा 1/2020-21 बचन िसंह बनाम कुलबीर िसंह आिद का िनˑारण गुण-दोष के आधार पर ˢतंআ ŝप से 06 माह के अȽर करना सुिनिʮत करŐ। पƗकार िदनांक 18.01.2022 को िवचारण Ɋायालय मŐ उपİ˕त हों। िवचारण Ɋायालय एवं अपीलीय Ɋायालय की पআाविलयां इस आदेश की ঋमािणत ঋित के साथ वापस की जा ये तथा इस Ɋायालय की पআावली बाद िमयाद अिभलेखागार मŐ संिचत हो ।"

The Board of Revenue while directing the parties to maintain the status quo qua the property, which is the subject matter of the proceedings under

Section 176 of the U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, pending consideration to be decided by the Court of Assistant Collector as Case No. 1 of 2020-21, Bachan Singh Vs. Kulveer Singh and others, it has been directed the parties to maintain the status quo, and simultaneously, a direction has also been issued to the Assistant Collector to decide the suit within a period of six months from the date of the order. But since, the Writ Petition was preferred, and the same remained pending, the Writ Petition is hereby dismissed.

Because the order impugned dated 28th December, 2021, does not at all prejudice the right of the present petitioner in any manner whatsoever. But, however, dismissing the Writ Petition and maintaining the direction issued by the order passed by the Board of Revenue, the time period granted by the Board of Revenue to the Court of Assistant Collector to decide the suit within a period of six months, the same would start running from today, and it is hoped and trusted that the Assistant Collector would decide the aforesaid Suit, i.e., Case No. 1 of 2020-21, Bachan Singh Vs. Kulveer Singh and others, within a period of six months from today.

(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) Dated 24.08.2023 Shiv