VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Lakshmi v. The District Collector,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 October 2025
Bench
G.R.Swaminathanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 29373/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.R.Swaminathan

Judgment

ORDER

Heard both sides.

2.This writ petition has been filed on the premise that compensation has not been paid for carrying out the petition mentioned activities.

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate submitted that the District Collector, Theni had already passed an order dated 03.09.2025 determining the compensation payable to the writ petitioner.

4.The learned counsel for the private respondent states that compensation had already been remitted in the revenue account. The District Collector is directed to secure the writ petitioner's bank account details and transfer the said account immediately and without any delay. It is open to the writ petitioner to withdraw the same and without prejudice to his rights to claim enhancement. The petitioner can move the District Court for enhancement. As and when such petition is filed, it shall be numbered immediately provided the papers are in order. The learned District Judge shall endeavour to dispose of the claim petition for enhancement on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six months thereafter.

¶5The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

17.10.2025

NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No MGA To

1.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate Building, Theni District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District.

3.The Tahsildar, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District.

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Andipatti, Theni District.

5.The Inspector of Police, Kandamanur Police Station, Rajathani, Theni District.

6.The Eurus Helios Infrastructure Private Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, No.12/1, Murugappa Street, Kotturpuram, Chennai.

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. MGA

17.10.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.10.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Lakshmi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate Building, Theni District. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Periyakulam, Theni District. 3.The Tahsildar, Andipatti Taluk, Theni District. 4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Andipatti, Theni District. 5.The Inspector of Police, Kandamanur Police Station, Rajathani, Theni District. 6.The Eurus Helios Infrastructure Private Limited, Rep. by its Authorised Signatory, No.12/1, Murugappa Street, Kotturpuram, Chennai. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 1 to 3 from erection of any solar or electric poles or using the land to lay any sort of wires in the land situated in Survey No. 330/2D, 330/3C, 334/3C, 339/2A and 330/1, 330/3A, 334/3B, and 339/2C situated at Govindhanagaram, Theni District on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 26.09.2025 within time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.Kannan Gurusami For Respondents : Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate for R.1 to R.3 Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R.4 & R.5 Mr.Aayiram K.Selvakumar for R.6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.