VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

C.Subramanian v. The Regional Passport Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
15 April 2026
Bench
Hemant Chandangoudarauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 10334/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow Hemant Chandangoudar

Judgment

ORDER Mr.A.Veluchamy, learned Central Government Standing Counsel takes notice for the respnodent.

¶2The petitioner is before this Court seeking for a direction to the respondent No.1 to renew the passport bearing File No.Z3515533 pursuant to the online application dated 10.03.2026 submitted by the petitioner.

¶3The grievance of the petitioner is that, though he has submitted an application for issuance of passport, the same has not been processed by the respondent. According to the petitioner, the application has been kept pending on the ground that criminal case has been registered against him. in Crime No.283 of 2022.

¶4Mr. A.Veluchamy, learned Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent, on receiving instructions, submitted that a criminal case has been pending against the petitioner.

¶5Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

¶6The refusal to issue or renew a passport is governed by the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967. Under Section 6 of the Act, the Passport Authority is empowered to refuse issuance or renewal of a passport only on the grounds specifically enumerated therein. One such ground is where proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a competent criminal court in India.

¶7In the present case, the only reason cited by the respondent is the registration of FIR against the petitioner. However, mere registration of FIR does not fall within the grounds contemplated under Section 6 of the Act. The statutory bar arises only when criminal proceedings are pending before a competent criminal court.

¶8Therefore, the action of the respondent in withholding the petitioner's application solely on the basis of the registration of FIR is not in consonance with the provisions of the Passports Act, 1967.

¶9In view of the above, this Court finds merit in the petitioner's contention.

¶10Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed, and the respondent is directed to process the petitioner's application for renewal of passport in File No.Z3515533 dated 10.03.2026 and issue the passport, subject to the petitioner satisfying all other eligibility criteria prescribed under law.

¶11The above exercise shall be completed within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶12There shall be no orders as to costs.

15.04.2026

Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No PJL To

The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Officer, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai.

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J. PJL

W.P.(MD)No.10334 of 2026

15.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.04.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P.(MD)No.10334 of 2026 C.Subramanian .. Petitioner - Vs. - The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Officer, Bharathi Ula Veethi, Race Course Road, Madurai. .. Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to renew the Petitioners Passport bearing Passport bearing No.Z3515533 based on his Online application Reference No.26-1054621793 dated 10.03.2026 immediately within a time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr. B.Prahalad Ravi For Respondent : Mr.A.Veluchamy, Central Government Standing Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.