VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Annalakshmi v. The Secretary to Government,

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
2 April 2026
Bench
N. Anand Venkatesh, K.K. Ramakrishnan
Case no.
WP Crl.(MD) 1587/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow N. Anand VenkateshFollow K.K. Ramakrishnan

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.] This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to transfer the petitioner's son namely Solai, S/o.Muniyasamy @ Uruttu Muniyasamy, from Vellore Central Prison to Madurai Prison.

¶2Pursuant to the earlier direction issued by this Court, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor produced the relevant materials, based on which, the detenue was transferred to Central Prison, Vellore.

¶3In our considered view, the administrative exigency prevailing has impelled the transfer of the detenue to Central Prison, Vellore. This Court, exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot interfere with every administrative action taken by the authorities unless such action is vitiated by arbitrariness or illegality. The materials placed before this Court do not indicate any such illegality or arbitrariness.

¶4The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that no reasons have been assigned and no order has been passed before the detenue was transferred.

¶5The learned counsel for the petitioner brought to our notice the judgment in H.C.P.No.1707 of 2017, dated 05.10.2017 and specifically placed reliance upon paragraph 7.2 of the said judgment.

¶6We are in complete agreement with the above judgment. As stated supra, the relevant material has been placed before this Court to justify the transfer of the prisoner and this Court has satisfied itself that there was an exigency faced by the respondents, which propelled the transfer. Hence, the above judgment does not help the petitioner in any way.

¶7In the case in hand, the confidential report was placed before the Court and we had the advantage of going through the same. If the reasons given in the confidential report are revealed by way of passing an order, it will only prove to be counterproductive. Hence, in cases of this nature, the confidential report relied upon by the respondents can be placed before the Court and the Court can satisfy itself as to whether there are valid reasons for the transfer of the detenue from one jail to another. It is for the Court to decide whether there is justification for the transfer or otherwise.

¶8In the case in hand, we are satisfied with the confidential report that was placed for the transfer of the detenue to Central Prison, Vellore. We are not inclined to interfere with the same. For the present, the request made by the petitioner seeking transfer of the detenue back to Central Prison, Madurai, cannot be acted upon. It is left open to the petitioner to revive the request after some time.

¶9This Writ Petition is disposed of on the above terms. No costs.

[N.A.V., J.] & [K.K.R.K., J.]

02.04.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Indu To

1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department (Prison), Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai-9.

2.The Director General of Prisons, Prison Department, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-8.

3.The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Prisons and Correctional Services Department, Madurai Range, Madurai.

4.The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Prisons and Correctional Services Department, Vellore Range, Vellore.

5.The Superitendent of Prison, Central Prison, Madurai.

6.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore.

7.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. N.ANANDoVENKATESH,oJ. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN,oJ. Indu W.P.Crl.(MD).No.1587oofo2026

02.04.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 02.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN W.P.Crl.(MD).No.1587 of 2026 Annalakshmi ...... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, Home Department (Prison), Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, St. George Fort, Chennai-9. 2.The Director General of Prisons, Prison Department, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai-8. 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Prisons and Correctional Services Department, Madurai Range, Madurai. 4.The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Prisons and Correctional Services Department, Vellore Range, Vellore. 5.The Superitendent of Prison, Central Prison, Madurai. 6.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Vellore. ...... Respondents Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to transfer the petitioner's son Thiru.Solai, S/o. Muniyasamy @ Uruttu Muniyasamy from Vellore Central Prison to Madurai Prison. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Karuppasamypandiyan For Respondents : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.