Manivel v. State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Samayapuram

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 20.02.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY K.Manivel ... Petitioner/Accused

Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by the Inspector of Police, Samayapuram Police Station, Trichirapalli District. (Crime No.540 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Yesudasan

Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.540 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 131, 126(2), 308(4) and 351(3) of BNS and Subsequently, the sections were altered as Under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 296(b), 131, 318(4), 308(4), 3(5), 61(2) and 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.540 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶2The prosecution's case is that the defacto complainant and one Gowri were in a Lodge. The accused persons threatened the defacto complainant and demanded payment of a sum of Rs.50,000/- and extracted a sum of Rs.7,000/- Hence, the complaint.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that co-accused had already been granted bail by this Court in Crl.OP(MD).No.1665 of 2026 dated 29.01.2026. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the investigation is still pending. Hence, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that co-accused had already been granted bail by this Court. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with other conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirchirappalli, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Trichirappalli, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

(a) the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b ) the petitioner shall make a non refundable deposit of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the credit of the Corporation Sethupathy Pandithurai Higher Secondary School, Railway Colony, Madurai, State Bank of India, Karimedu, Madurai, Account No.30033864969, IFSC No.SBIN0008167, MICR Code: 625002017, without prejudice to his contentions and rights before the trial Court, and on such deposit being made, the learned Judicial Magistrate shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioner; (c ) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

(d) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f) on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560] and;

(g) if the accused/petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS, 2023. (S S Y J)

20.02.2026 msrm To

¶1The learned Judicial Magistrate No.III, Trichirappalli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Samayapuram Police Station, Trichirapalli District.

¶3The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4.The Corporation Sethupathy Pandithurai Higher Secondary School, Railway Colony, Madurai. S.SRIMATHY,J msrm ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.3591 of 2026 Date : 20.02.2026