Ragib Alam v. State Rep. by

ORDER The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

04.12.2025, for the alleged offence punishable under Section 25(1)(a) of Arms Act, in Crime No.389 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶2The allegation against these petitioners is that, on 04.12.2025 the petitioners were found to be in possession of firearms licensed in the State of Bihar without obtaining any valid permit or license from the State of Tamil Nadu. Hence this case.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioners are in judicial custody since 04.12.2025; and that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioners.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that these petitioners are ranked as A1 and A2, investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature, the petitioners are not having any previous cases. Hence, he strongly opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the First Information Report.

¶6Considering the nature of offences, the petitioners are not having any previous cases, the petitioners having license and today a copy of license was also produced before this Court, and considering the period of incarceration, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. [a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Hosur, and on further conditions that:- [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at

10.30 a.m. for a period of thirty days and thereafter as and when requires for interrogation. [c] the petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he is suspected; [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

30.12.2025 rna Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Hosur.

2.The Inspector of Police, HUDCO Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Sub Jail, Hosur.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

P.DHANABAL, J. rna

30.12.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.12.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL 1.Ragib Alam 2.Ramjan Ansari ... Petitioners -vs- State Rep by, The Inspector of Police, HUDCO Police Station, Krishnagiri District. (Crime No.389 of 2025) ... Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No.389 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.J.Pradeep For Respondent : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) **********