- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 18 November 2025
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, Mohammed Shaffiq
- Case no.
- WMP 49664/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow S.M. SubramaniamFollow Mohammed Shaffiq
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ in W.P. Nos.14063, 14070, 14073, 14076 and 14080 of 2023 Tvl Ramaiah Channakeshava No.110/3B, Marandapally Village, Soolagiri Post, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. ... Petitioner in all W.M.Ps Vs. The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Hosur (North)-II, Hosur. ... Respondent in all W.M.Ps Petitions to modify the order dated 08.01.2024 in W.P. Nos. 14063, 14070, 14073, 14076 and 14080 of 2023 by granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue alternate remedy in accordance with law with respect to defects in the impugned assessment orders that do not relate to GST on royalty / seignorage fee. For Petitioner : Mr.Adithya Reddy in all WMPs For Respondent : Mr.C.Harsha Raj, Special Government Pleader (Taxes) in all WMPs COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.) These miscellaneous petitions have been filed to modify the order dated 08.01.2024 in W.P. Nos. 14063, 14070, 14073, 14076 and 14080 of 2023 by granting liberty to the petitioner to pursue alternate remedy in accordance with law with respect to defects in the impugned assessment orders that do not relate to GST on royalty / seignorage fee.
¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that apart from the issues covered and decided in the batch of writ petitions on 08.01.2024, there were certain other issues in the orders of assessment, by which the petitioner was aggrieved. The above issues were neither raised nor decided by this Court. He would only seek liberty to file appeals against those issues not forming the subject matter in the writ petitions.
¶3Learned Special Government Pleader (Taxes) would submit that the remedy by way of appeal is available, if petitioner is aggrieved by the order of adjudication in respect of issues not covered in the above writ petition. In view thereof, this Court is inclined to grant liberty to the petitioner to file appeals within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order subject to compliance of all conditions relating to appeals including pre-deposit, if any, and in case appeals are filed within the stipulated period, the same shall be admitted and entertained without reference to limitation, a course not objected by learned counsel for respondent.
¶4These miscellaneous petitions are disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. [S.M.S., J.] [M.S.Q., J.]
18.11.2025 mmi To The Assistant Commissioner (ST), Hosur (North)-II, Hosur. W.M.P.,Nos.49664,,49667,,49668,,49673,and,49674,of,2025 in,W.P.,Nos.14063,,14070,,14073,,14076,and,14080,of,2023 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,eJ. AND MOHAMMEDeSHAFFIQ,eJ. mmi W.M.P.eNos.49664,e49667,e49668,e49673e ande49674eofe2025 ineW.P.eNos.14063,e14070,e14073,e 14076eande14080eofe2023 W.M.P.,Nos.49664,,49667,,49668,,49673,and,49674,of,2025 in,W.P.,Nos.14063,,14070,,14073,,14076,and,14080,of,2023
18.11.2025
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.