VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

S.Hema v. B.Krishnamoorthy

ORDERED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 November 2025
Bench
S Justice T.V.Thamilselviauthor
Case no.
CRL MP 21622/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice T.V.Thamilselvi

Judgment

ORDER This petition has been filed to suspend the sentence confirmed by the XIX Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai on 23.09.2025 in C.A.No.515/2025 imposed on her in STC No.8033/2024 by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I, Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai on 04.04.2025 and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above numbered main Revision Petition.

¶2The petitioner herein is the accused in STC No.8033/204 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I, Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai. He was found guilty of the offence under Sections 138 of N.I Act and sentenced to undergo 6 months Simple Imprisonment and also directed to pay a compensation of Rs.3,50,000/-, in default, to undergo two months Simple Imprisonment. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner had filed appeal in C.A.No.515/2025 on the file of the XIX Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, by an order dated 23.09.2025, it had dismissed the appeal against which the present revision has been filed.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner/accused would submit that the courts below failed to take note of the fact that there is difference of signature in promissory note and the case cheque and also failed consider the rebuttal of presumption in the aspect of the amount filled in the cheque. Further, there are arguable points available in the Criminal Revision Case and the petitioner/accused has got a fair chance of succeeding in the Criminal Revision Case and hence, the substantive sentence imposed against the petitioner/accused may be suspended. He would submit that the petitioner is ready to abide any condition to be imposed by this Court.

¶4Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also perused the materials placed on record.

¶5Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, coupled with the quantum of punishment imposed upon the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that this criminal revision is not likely to be taken for final hearing in the near future, this Court is of the view that the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone can be suspended on certain conditions. Accordingly, till the disposal of the Criminal Revision Case, the reliefs of suspension of sentence and bail are granted on the following conditions:

(i) the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- to the credit of STC No.8033/2024 on the file of the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I, Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai, within a period of 3 weeks from today. Failing which, the order passed by this Court shall stand automatically cancelled and the complainant is permitted to withdraw the same by filing undertaking affidavit.

(ii) On such deposit being made, the trial Court shall redeposit the said amount in a Fixed Deposit Account, in any one of the Nationalized Banks, renewable thereafter periodically. The disbursal of this amount shall be decided at the culmination of the Criminal Revision Case;

(iii) On the failure of the petitioner/accused depositing the above said amount, it is open to the trial Court to commit the petitioner/accused into custody for undergoing the sentence.

(iv) On the petitioner depositing the amount as stated clause

(i) supra, the sentence of imprisonment alone, imposed on the petitioner/accused, shall be suspended, on his execution of a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties, each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the trial court;

(v) The petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the trial Court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book and mobile numbers to ensure their identity;

(vi) The petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on the first working day of every English Calendar month at

10.30 a.m., until the disposal of the revision petition and if he is not able to appear before the trial Court on any day, he shall make arrangements to file an application under Section 355 of BNSS, 2023 and shall appear before the trial Court on any other day in lieu of the date of his absence, as directed by the trial Court;

¶6With the above directions, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is ordered. 18-11-2025 pbl Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To

¶1The XIX Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶2The Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I, Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai CRLeRCeNo.e2397eofe2025 T.V.THAMILSELVIoJ. ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopbl CRLoMPoNO.o21622oOFo 2025 IN CRLoRCoNo.o2397oofo 2025 18-11-2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-11-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL MP NO. 21622 OF 2025 IN 1. S.Hema W/o.Arun Ragavendar, No.364, TNHB Quarters, Mambakkam Main Road, Sittalapakkam, Chennai-600 126. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. B.Krishnamoorthy S/o.Bakthavachalam, No.15, Ganapathy Street, Royapettah, Chennnai-600 014. Respondent(s) CRL MP No. 21622 of 2025 PRAYER To suspend the sentence confirmed by the XIX Additional Sessions Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai on 23.09.2025 in C.A.No.515/2025 imposed on her in STC No.8033/2024 by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I, Egmore at Allikulam, Chennai on 04.04.2025 and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above numbered main Revision Petition. For Petitioner(s): T.Naveen Chandar G.Tamilselvan P.Sreenath For Respondent:

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.