- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 10 March 2026
- Bench
- C. Saravanan
- Case no.
- WP 9672/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow C. Saravanan
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and W.M.P.Nos.10422, 10424, 10434 & 10436 of 2026 M/s. Siechem Technologies Private Limited, Represented by its Executive Director, Shri. G.M. Arunkumar, R.S.No. 104/8 & 105/7, Sedarapet Main Road, Villianur Commune, Puducherry – 605 010. ... Petitioner in both W.Ps Vs.
¶1The Assistant Commissioner, II Division, O/o. The Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Puducherry Division – II, Puducherry – 605 010.
¶2The Additional Commissioner of GST (Appeals-I), O/o. The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals -I), No. 26/1, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondents in both W.Ps Prayer in W.P.No.9672 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned Order-in-Original No.24/2022-23-GST dated 09.03.2023 in C.No. ADJ/GST/74/2022-CGST passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.9682 of 2026: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned Order-in-Appeal No.44/2025 (GSTA-1)
(ADC) dated 06.02.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : M/s.T.V.Muthu Abirami in both W.Ps For Respondents : Mr.M.Santhanaraman in both W.Ps Senior Standing Counsel & Mr.J.Vasu, Junior Standing Counsel COMMON ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Senior Standing Counsel, and the learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents.
¶2In W.P.No.9672 of 2026, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Order-in-Original No.24/2022-23-GST, dated 09.03.2023, passed by the 1st respondent, bearing C.No. ADJ/GST/74/2022-CGST.
¶3In W.P.No.9682 of 2026, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Order-in-Appeal No.44/2025 (GSTA-1) (ADC), dated 06.02.2025, passed by the 2nd respondent.
¶4By the impugned Order-in-Original, the demand proposed in Show Cause Notice No.4/2022-GST, dated 03.11.2022, was confirmed.
¶5Aggrieved by the said Order-in-Original, the petitioner earlier made an unsuccessful attempt to have it rectified under Section 161 of the respective GST enactments by filing an application dated 31.03.2023 before the 1st respondent, which was rejected by an Order dated 13.10.2023.
¶6Thereafter, the petitioner filed an appeal before the 2nd respondent on
18.12.2023 against the Order-in-Original No.24/2022-23-GST, dated
09.03.2023. The said appeal was rejected by Order-in-Appeal No.44/2025 (GSTA-1) (ADC) dated 06.02.2025.
¶7The petitioner has now approached this Court against the Order-in-Original dated 09.03.2023 and the subsequent Order-in-Appeal dated
06.02.2025 passed by the 1st and 2nd respondents, respectively.
¶8Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Senior Standing Counsel, and the learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents, I am of the view that the interest of the petitioner will be protected if the appeal that was pending before the 2nd respondent is restored.
¶9Consequently, W.P.No.9672 of 2026, challenging the Order-in-Original No.24/2022-23-GST dated 09.03.2023, is dismissed.
¶10Accordingly, W.P.No.9682 of 2026 is allowed, and the appeal filed on 18.12.2023 before the 2nd respondent is restored.
¶11The 2nd respondent shall dispose of the appeal on merits and in accordance with law, within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
¶12In view thereof, all the miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.
10.03.2026 raja To
¶1The Assistant Commissioner, II Division, O/o. The Assistant Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Puducherry Division – II, Puducherry – 605 010.
¶2The Additional Commissioner of GST (Appeals-I), O/o. The Commissioner of GST and Central Excise (Appeals -I), No. 26/1, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.
C.SARAVANAN, J. raja
10.03.2026
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.