Ramesh v. State Represented by the Inspector of Police

ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 303(2), 326 of BNS, 2023 r/w Section 21(5) of Mines & Minerals Act, in Crime No.149 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. Page2 of 6

¶2The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with co-accused were involved in illegal transportation of one unit of Vandal sand without any valid permit or licence by using a Ashok Leyland Lorry, bearing registration No. TN 69 AA 3237 and that the petitioner is the owner cum driver of the vehicle, was caught red handed by the respondent police. Hence, the case.

¶3The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was innocent and that he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that he is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and he is ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and, upon instructions, submitted that one previous cases have been registered against the petitioner. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶5I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. Page3 of 6

¶6From the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) , it is seen that the petitioner has one previous case. Though his Court views the offence of theft of natural resources and its exploitation as serious offence, considering the fact that the petitioner may mend his ways in future and in the hope that he would not involve himself in any further unlawful activities or come under the adverse notice of the respondent, this Court is inclined to enlarge him on anticipatory bail, subject to certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the Learned Judicial Magistrate, Kalasapakkam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further conditions:

(a) If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

(b) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb Page4 of 6 impression in the application for surety ship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]'. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identify proofs to ensure their identity;

(c) The petitioner/accused is directed to produce a demand draft for a sum of Rs. 60,000/- (Rupees Sixty thousand only) in favour of the 'The Chairman/District Collector, The District Mineral Foundation Trust of Thiruvannamali District', (Non refundable) before the learned Judicial Court, Kalasapakkam;

(d) On production of the above Demand Draft, the learned Magistrate is directed to take necessary steps to hand over the same to the District Collector. Upon receipt of the said amount, the District Collector shall realise and utilise the same strictly in accordance with law and in terms of G.O.Ms.No.84, Natural Resources (MMD.1) Department, dated 16.12.2025;

(e) The petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 am for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

(f) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate actions against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji v. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; Page5 of 6

(g) If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS Act. 10-07-2026 JRS To

¶1The Judicial Magistrarte, Kalasapakkam.

2.The Inspector of Police Kalasapakkam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. Crime No.149 of 2026.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o17847oofo2026 C.KUMARAPPAN,oJ. JRS CRLoOPoNo.o17847oofo2026 10-07-2026 Page6oofo6

Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Ramesh No.57, Pillayar Koil Street, Mutharasampoondhi,Thennagaram , Tiruvannamalai District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police Kalasapakkam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. Crime No.149 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of Arrest in Crime no.149 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Kalasapakkam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District. For Petitioner(s): M/S. Silambu Selvan S For Respondent(s): MR.N.PALANIVEL, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE)