VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

S.Mohamed Anas v. Rider Distributors,

PARTLY ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
17 April 2025
Bench
P. Velmuruganauthor
Case no.
CRL A 733/2024

Follow Madras High CourtFollow P. Velmurugan

Judgment

JUDGMENT This Criminal Appeal has been filed by the appellant to set aside the judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I at Allikulam, Chennai - 3, acquitting the accused/respondents for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for non-prosecution in C.C.No.3569 of 2019 dated 02.06.2023.

¶2The case of the appellant is that the appellant's son had filed a complaint against the respondents herein before the Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I at Allikulam, Chennai in C.C.No.3569 of 2019 for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Subsequently, the respondents/accused filed a quash petition before this Court in Crl.O.P.No.23602 of 2019 on the ground that the cheque was not given by the Company and the same was given by Karthik/the 2 nd respondent/2 nd accused, from his personal banking by individual capacity and this Court by order dated

24.06.2022, quashed the complaint in C.C.No.3569 of 2019 as against the 1 st and 3 rd respondents and liberty was given to the appellant to proceed the case as against the 2 nd respondent/Karthik alone. Subsequently the case in C.C.No.3569 of 2023 was posted before the trial Court on 02.06.2023 and notice was also issued to both the parties. Meanwhile, since the complainant/appellant's son went to abroad, he had given power of attorney to his father/appellant herein on 15.05.2023. However, the appellant/power of attorney holder of the complainant was unable to appear before the trial Court on the said date i.e. 02.06.2023 as he was bed ridden due ill health. The learned trial Judge, without considering the fact, simply dismissed the complaint itself for non prosecution by order dated 02.06.2023 and acquitted the accused. Hence, the present appeal is filed before this Court.

¶3The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that already the complaint against the respondents 1 and 3 was quashed by this Court and therefore, the appeal is not maintainable.

¶4Heard and perused the materials available on record.

¶5Though the complaint itself was dismissed by the trial Court for non prosecution on 02.06.2023, it is seen from the records that already the respondents/accused approached this Court by way of filing quash petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and this Court by order dated 24.06.2022 quashed the complaint as against the 1 st and 3 rd respondents giving liberty to prosecute the 2 nd respondent alone. Further, direction has also been given to the trial Court to proceed against the 2 nd respondent/2 nd Accused and dispose of the complaint preferably within a period of six months. Therefore, the order passed by the Magistrate in C.C.No.3569 of 2019 dated 02.06.2023 is set aside.

¶6The learned Metropolitan Magistrate is directed to proceed with the complaint in C.C.No.3569 of 2019 as against the 2 nd respondent alone and dispose of the case in accordance with law, within a period of six months from today.

¶7With the above directions, this Criminal Appeal is allowed.

¶8The appellant is directed to appear before the Magistrate on

29.04.2025 failing which, the order passed by the Magistrate itself shall stand confirmed.

17.04.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No ksa-2 Note: Issue Order Copy on 28.04.2025. To The Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-I at Allikulam, Chennai - 3 P.VELMURUGAN. J. Ksa-2

17.04.2025

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 17.04.2025 Coram: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN S.Mohamed Anas S/o.Shaik Nizamudeen Rep. by his Power Agent Shaik Nizamudeed, S/o.Abdul Razak New No.31/11, Balaji Tower Puram Prakasam Road Royapettah, Chennai - 600 014 ... Appellant Vs. 1.Rider Distributors Represented by its Partners P.Karthik S/o.Purushottam & Christina, W/o. Karthik Having Office at No.7, Mahkavi Bharathiar Street Ram Nagar Extn., Urapakkam West Chennai- 603 211 2. P.Karthik 3. Christina ... Respondents Prayer: Criminal Appeal filed under Section 378 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the acquittal judgment passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court -I at Allikulam, Chennai - 3, acquitting the accused/respondent for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act for non-prosecution in C.C.No.3569 of 2019 dated 02.06.2023. For Appellant : Mr.R.Vivekananthan For Mr.T.R.Ravi For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Niranjhan

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.