- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 June 2025
- Bench
- P. Velmurugan
- Case no.
- WP 18327/2025
Follow Madras High CourtFollow P. Velmurugan
Judgment
O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned Notice dated 24.04.2024 issued by the 2nd respondent against the petitioner and quash the same.
¶2Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
¶3The case of the petitioner is that he is a physically challenged person having permanent disability and he is running a bunk shop at Door No.8, CTH Road, Ambattur Estate, Chennai, for his livelihood. The second respondent-Police, without any basis, issued a notice dated
24.04.2025 to the petitioner to evict his shop. It is further submitted that the Township Vending Committee constituted by the Government of Tamil Nadu alone is the competent authority to decide as to whether the road side vending can be permitted or not in a particular place. However, the second respondent-Police is acting at the behest of M/s.NTIT Data Centre, without following any due process of law and issued the said notice. Hence, the petitioner is constrained to file the present petition.
¶4Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents-Police, on instructions, submitted that the Greater Chennai Corporation has taken steps to remove the encroachments in accordance with law and that they sought Police protection. Therefore, the respondents-Police, in order to execute the order of the Corporation, had extended their service and issued impugned notice to the petitioner to vacate his shop.
¶5On a perusal of the impugned notice dated 24.04.2025, it is seen that there is a whisper about the reference regarding the local body issued to the petitioner and the second respondent had issued the impugned notice without any authority. Therefore, the impugned notice dated 24.04.2024 is hereby quashed. However, the Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation is hereby directed to take action against the petitioner, if at all the petitioner is an unauthorised encroacher, in the manner known to law.
¶6With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
30.06.2025 Index: Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms To
¶1The Commissioner of Police, Avadi Commissionarate, Avadi, Chennai – 600 054.
¶2The Inspector of Police (L&O), T-2, Ambattur Estate Police Station, Chennai – 600 058.
¶3The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation, Chennai.
¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. P.VELMURUGAN,
J ms
30.06.2025
Case details
Parties and counsel
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.P.No. 18327 of 2025 and W.M.P.No.20532 of 2025 A.Mohanraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Commissioner of Police, Avadi Commissionarate, Avadi, Chennai – 600 054. 2. The State Represented by Inspector of Police (L&O), T-2, Ambattur Estate Police Station, Chennai – 600 058. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned Notice dated 24.04.2024 issued by the 2nd respondent against the petitioner and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Viswanathan For Respondents : Dr.C.E.Pratap Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.