VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2025 › High Court of Madras

Kaliyani Sundaram v. The State Rep by the Inspector of Police

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 May 2025
Bench
S Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadiauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 16144/2025

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi

Judgment

ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 01.03.2025, seeking bail in Crime No.69 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 310(2) & 311 of BNS, 2023. Page No.1 of 6

2.It is the case of the prosecution that the petitioner and other accused persons illegally restraint the defacto complainant and robbed a sum of Rs.7,000/- and transferred a sum of Rs.10,000/- through Gpay and ½ sovereign of gold chain. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that co-accused were granted bail in Crl.M.P. No.787 of 2025 dated 23.04.2025; Crl.M.P. No.664 of 2025 dated 17.04.2025 and Crl.M.P. No.728 of 2025 dated

17.04.2025 by the Trial Court. He would further submit that the petitioner is in custody from 01.03.2025 and hence, further custody is not required and sought for bail.

4.Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and confirmed the fact that co-accused were granted bail by the Trial Court in Crl.M.P. No.787 of 2025 dated 23.04.2025; Crl.M.P. No.664 of 2025 dated 17.04.2025 and Crl.M.P. No.728 of 2025 dated 17.04.2025. Page No.2 of 6

5.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6.Considering the nature of allegations, the period incarceration and the fact that the co-accused were granted bail in Crl.M.P. No.787 of 2025 dated

23.04.2025; Crl.M.P. No.664 of 2025 dated 17.04.2025 and Crl.M.P. No.728 of 2025 dated 17.04.2025 and since further custody of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at

10.30 a.m., for a period of 2 months and thereafter as and when required for Page No.3 of 6 interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

28.05.2025 rkp/ata Note :

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. Page No.4 of 6 Copy to:

1.The Inspector of Police, Oragadam Police Station, Kancheepuram District.

2.The Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudur.

3.The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Page No.5 of 6 K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI.J., rkp/ata

28.05.2025 Page No.6 of 6

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.05.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI Kaliyani Sundaram ...Petitioner/Accused-7 Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, Oragadam Police Station, Kancheepuram District. (Crime No.69 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER: This criminal original petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.69 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rahul For Respondent : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.