- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 June 2026
- Bench
- G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
- Case no.
- WP Crl. 1025/2026
Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.K. Ilanthiraiyan
Judgment
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction against the respondents 1 and 2 to provide appropriate protection against the acts of trespass and interference allegedly committed by the respondents 4 and 5, their men agents, representatives, or any other persons acting through or under them, in respect of the properties more fully described in the schedule to this Writ Petition. Page3 of 5
¶2The case of the petitioner is that he is the auction purchaser of the subject property pursuant to the auction conducted by the third respondent. The respondents 4 and 5 were the original borrowers and owners of the subject property. However, due to default committed by them, the property was brought to auction sale. After purchasing the property, the petitioner has not in possession and enjoyment of the same. While so, the respondents 4 and 5 allegedly attempted to trespass into the subject property and disturb the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner lodged a complaint before the second respondent, which is stated to be pending.
¶3In view of the above, the second respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, after issuing notice to the petitioner as well as the respondents 4 and 5, and take appropriate action in accordance with law, if any prima facie material is available against the respondents 4 and 5.
¶4It is also made clear that the second respondent shall peruse the documents produced by the petitioner and the respondents 4 and 5 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. Page4 of 5
¶5With the above direction, this writ petition (criminal) stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 05-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order av To
¶1The Superintendent of Police SP Office, Palladam Main Road, Karuppa Goundanpalayam, Tiruppur – 641 604.
¶2The Inspector Of Police Perumanallur Police Station, Tiruppur – 641 666.
¶3State Bank of India Stressed Assets Management Branch, 1112, Raja Plaza, Avinashi Road, Coimbatore – 641 037.
¶4The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. Page5 of 5
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. av 05-06-2026
Case details
Parties and counsel
Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN and WPMP.Crl.No.340 of 2026 Dollar Holdings Private Limited Rep By its Managing Director, Binay Kumar Gupta, Having its Office at No.201, Block - 5, K.R.C.Dakshin Chitra Thiyagi, Palanisamy Nagar, Gandhi Nagar, Tiruppur. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police SP Office, Palladam Main Road, Karuppa Goundanpalayam, Tiruppur – 641 604. 2. The Inspector Of Police Perumanallur Police Station, Perumanallur, Tiruppur – 641 666. 3. State Bank of India Stressed Assets Management Branch, 1112, Raja Plaza, Avinashi Road, Coimbatore – 641 037. 4. S.Ravikumar S.F.No.110, Ayyan Thottam, Paramasivampalayam Road, Kalampalayam Post, Tiruppur – 641 666. 5. S.Krishnakumar S.F.No.110, Ayyan Thottam, Paramasivampalayam Road, Kalampalayam Post, Tiruppur – 641 666. ..Respondent(s) Page2 of 5 PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus direction against the 1st and 2nd respondents, directing them to grant appropriate protection from the trespassing and interference being committed by the 4th and 5th respondents, their men agents, representatives, or any other persons acting through or under them, in the properties more fully described in the schedule to this Writ Petition. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.S.Krishnan, Senior Counsel for Mr.N.Sasank Iyer For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Ganesh Kumar, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for R1 And R2 Mr.M.L.Ganesh for R3 Mr.Abdukumar Rajarathinam, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.Balamurugan for R4 & R5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.