VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Vasanth Pp v. The State Rep.By,

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
7 May 2026
Bench
S Justice L.Victoria Gowriauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 11219/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S Justice L.Victoria Gowri

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner, apprehends arrest for the alleged offences under Section 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 and altered into Sections 191(2), 191(3), 296(b), 118(1), 351(3), 109(1) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.26 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

¶2The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, petitioner along with other accused attacked the defacto complainant, due to which, defacto complainant sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the co-accused has been enlarged on bail. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the injured has been enlarged on bail, however, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made on either side and upon the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶6Accordingly, the petitioner are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate, Sungavachatiram on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of one month and thereafter, as and when required for further interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

07.05.2026 sma/ep Note :

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1Judicial Magistrate, Sungavachitiram

¶2The Inspector of Police, Sungavachitiram Police Station, Kanchipuram District.

¶3The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sma/ep

07.05.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.05.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI CRL.O.P.No.11219 of 2026 Vasanth P P ... Petitioner Versus The State rep by, The Inspector of Police, Sungavachitiram Police Station, Kanchipuram District. (Crime No.18 of 2026) .. Respondent Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS Act, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police pending investigation in Crime No.18 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivagurunath For Respondent : A.Damodaran Additional Public Prosecutor

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.