VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Thirugnanam v. The State Rep by

GRANTED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
30 April 2026
Bench
G.K. Ilanthiraiyanauthor
Case no.
CRL OP 10714/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow G.K. Ilanthiraiyan

Judgment

ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

17.03.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 120(B), 420, 468 & 471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, in Crime No.02 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. Page2 of 5

¶2The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons induced the defacto complainant and others to invest money in a Trust by producing forged documents and collected a sum of Rs.1,75,00,000/-. The petitioner is arrayed as A9. Hence, the case was registered.

¶3The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has no role in the alleged offence and he is only a temporary employee and his bank account was misused by other accused. It is further submitted that there is no overt act attributed to the petitioner. The learned counsel would submit that the main accused have already been released on bail and the petitioner has been in custody for more than 30 days. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶4The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police, while opposing for grant of bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner was arrested on

17.03.2026. He would submit that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

¶5Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. Page3 of 5

¶6Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegations, submissions made by the learned counsels on either side and the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶7Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore, and subject to the following conditions: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioner released on Page4 of 5 bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 30-04-2026 NSL Note:

¶1Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

¶2All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

¶1The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Coimbatore.

¶2The Central Prison, Coimbatore.

¶3The Inspector of Police, CBCID OCU wing, Coimbatore City.

¶4The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRLoOPoNo.o10714oofo2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN,oJ. NSL CRLoOPoNo.o10714oofo2026 30-04-2026 Page5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN Thirugnanam ..Petitioner Vs State Represented by The Inspector of Police, CBCID OCU wing, Coimbatore City. Crime No. 02 of 2025 ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in connection with the case in Crime No.02 of 2025 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent police. For Petitioner: Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondent: Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.