VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

M/S.Hlg Trading Through Its Authorised v. The Commissioner of Customs Chennai

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 June 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 12644/2021

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in and connected with Speaking Order No.83925/2021 dated 15.04.2021 made in F. No. CUS/APR/BE/MISC/764/2020/GR-3 of the second respondent, quash the same and direct the second respondent to extend the benefit of Notification No.30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004 as amended with respect to importations made by the petitioner under 12 bills of entry from levy of countervailing duty by reassessing the said bills of entry, quantifying the same for the purpose of entitling the petitioner to seek refund of the same.

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that as against the impugned order, there is effective appeal remedy available to the petitioner before the Commissioner of Customs [Appeals]. Hence, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, may grant liberty to the petitioner to exhaust the appeal remedy. The learned counsel further submitted that the period during which the writ petition was pending before this Court may be excluded for the purpose of limitation.

3.Considering the limited request now made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, permits the petitioner to file appeal before the Commissioner of Customs [Appeals]. The period during which the writ petition was pending before this Court is excluded for the purpose of limitation. M.DHANDAPANI,J. pri

4.The writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

03.06.2026 pri Index: Yes/ No Speaking Order: Yes/ No NCC: Yes/ No To

1.The Commissioner of Customs, Chennai – II II Commissionerate, Custom House, 60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001.

2.The Deputy / Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Group III Formerly Group 7B/7H O/o Commissioner of Customs, Chennai – II Commissionerate, Custom House, 60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. And W.M.P.No.13432 of 2021

03.06.2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And W.M.P.No.13432 of 2021 M/s.HLG Trading through its Authorised Signatory Shri H.L.Goyal, Son of late Jagath Ram Goyal, Space "E", 3rd Floor, Surya Kiran Complex, 92, the Mall, Ludhiana, Punjab. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Customs, Chennai – II II Commissionerate, Custom House, 60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. 2.The Deputy / Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Group III Formerly Group 7B/7H O/o Commissioner of Customs, Chennai – II Commissionerate, Custom House, 60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai – 600 001. ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in and connected with Speaking Order No.83925/2021 dated 15.04.2021 made in F. No. CUS/APR/BE/MISC/764/2020/GR-3 of the second respondent, quash the same and direct the second respondent to extend the benefit of Notification No.30/2004-CE dated 09.07.2004 as amended with respect to importations made by the petitioner under 12 bills of entry from levy of countervailing duty by reassessing the said bills of entry, quantifying the same for the purpose of entitling the petitioner to seek refund of the same. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Satish Sundar For Respondents : Mr.Sai Srujan Tayi for R1, R2 Senior Panel Counsel

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.