VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Baskaran Kanagavel v. The Secretary

DISPOSED OF WITH DIRECTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 April 2026
Bench
M.Dhandapaniauthor
Case no.
WP 15549/2026

Follow Madras High CourtFollow M.Dhandapani

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent / Commissioner, HR and CE Department, Chennai, to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's appeal dated 26.10.2025 on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a time frame as fixed by this Court.

¶2Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side. With the consent of both sides, the present Writ Petition is taken up for hearing at the admission stage itself. Page3 of 5

¶3It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was the elected President/Head of Non Hereditary Trustee Committee of the subject temple and renovation works were carried out by him in the said temple. While so, alleging irregularities against the petitioner, one S.Rajendran, Secretary of the Sirappuli Nayanar Weekly Worship Committee, he was removed by the second respondent through the impugned order dated 16.10.2025, as against which the petitioner preferred an appeal on 26.10.2025 and also sent reminders in this regard to the first respondent on 11.11.2025, 14.11.2025 and 04.12.2025, which evoked no response and hence, the present Writ Petition.

¶4In view of the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner in this Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's appeal dated 26.10.2025 and to dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as any other interested parties, if any, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further, the petitioner is directed to send the copy of the representations made to the first respondent dated

11.11.2025, 14.11.2025 and 04.12.2025 to the second respondent. Page4 of 5

¶5With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 24-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order DP To

¶1The Secretary Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Ft. St. George, Cehnnai-600 009

¶2The Commissioner Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Uttamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, ch-34

¶3the Joint commissioner office of the Joint Commissioner, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Nagapattinam.

¶4The Assistant Commissioner office of the Assistant Commissioner, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Krishnagiri.

¶5The Executive officer Arulmigu Akkur Thanthondreeswarar Thirukovil, Tharangambadi Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District. Page5 of 5

M.DHANDAPANI, J. DP 24-04-2026

Case details

Parties and counsel

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Baskaran Kanagavel S/o.Kanagavel, Residing at No.180-6, Perumal Koil St, Akkur, Tharangabadi Taluk, Nagapattinam District-609 301 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Secretary Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Secretariat, Ft. St. George, Cehnnai-600 009 2. The Commissioner Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Uttamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, ch-34 3. The Joint commissioner office of the Joint Commissioner, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Nagapattinam. 4. The Assistant Commissioner office of the Assistant Commissioner, Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments Department, Krishnagiri. Page2 of 5 5. The Executive officer Arulmigu Akkur Thanthondreeswarar Thirukovil, Tharangambadi Taluk, Mayiladuthurai District. ..Respondent(s) Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent / Commissioner, HR and CE Department, Chennai, to consider and pass orders on the petitioners appeal dated 26.10.2025 on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Ms.H.Lucia Priyadarshini For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Ravichandran, AGP [HR & CE]

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.