VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2026 › High Court of Madras

Shanmugha Arts Science Technology and v. The State of Tamil Nadu

DISMISSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
9 January 2026
Bench
S.M. Subramaniam, C.Kumarappan
Case no.
WP 6989/2022

Follow Madras High CourtFollow S.M. SubramaniamFollow C.Kumarappan

Judgment

Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 18-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP Nos. 6989 & 6993 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 7016 OF 2022,WMP NO. 7019 OF 2022, WMP NO. 7023 OF 2022 &WMP NO. 7025 OF 2022, W.P.6989 of 2022

¶1Shanmugha Arts Science Technology and Research academy (SASTRA) Deemed University Thirumalaisamudram Thanjavur 613 402 Having office, at No. 5 Subbarayan Nagar main Street Chennai 600 024

¶2VEE SEE BEE Trust Administering Shanmugha Poly Technic having its office No. 5 Subbarayan Nagar Main Street, Chennai 24 Rep by its Trustee ..Petitioner(s) Vs Rep by its secretary to Government Revenue department Fort St. George, Chennai 09

¶2The Special commissioner and commissioner of Land Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk chennai 05 Page2 of 5

¶6The Tahsildar ..Respondent(s) WP No. 6993 of 2022

¶1Shanmugha Arts Science Technology and Research academy (SASTRA) Deemed University Thirumalaisamudram Thanjavur 613 402 Having office, at No. 5 Subbarayan Nagar main Street Chennai 600 024

¶2VEE SEE BEE Trust Administering Shanmugha Poly Technic having its office No. 5 Subbarayan Nagar Main Street chennai 24 Rep by its Trustee ..Petitioner(s) Vs Rep by its secretary to Government Revenue department Fort St. Goerge chennai 09

¶2The Special commissioner and commissioner of Land Administration Ezhilagam chepauk chennai 05

¶6The Tahsildar ..Respondent(s) Calling for the records relating to order passed by the 1st Respondent in G.O.Ms.No. 84 (Revenue and Disaster Management Department Land Decisions NM 6-2 Division) dated 23.02.2022, quash the same and consequently direct the Respondnets to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 20.09.2018 and for their representation dated Page3 of 5

27.09.2021 and 22.10.2021 in accordance with law and the orders of the Honble Supreme court in S.I.P. D. No. 33230 of 2018 dated 14.09.2018 WP No. 6993 of 2022 Calling for the records relating to the Evicition Notice issued by the 6th Respondent dated 25.02.2022 in R.C. No. 19205 / 2003 / B5 and quash the same For Petitioner(s): Mr. P.H.Aravind Pandian, Senior Counsel for Mr.Amrith Bhargav.B. For Respondent(s): Mr.T. Arun Kumar, AGP for R1 to 6. COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Today, the matter is listed under the caption ' for reporting compliance'.

¶2Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that as against the order passed by this Court, Special Leave Petition has been filed and an interim order has been passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) Nos.2359-2360/2026 vide order dated 15.01.2026.

¶3In view of the order dated 15.01.2026 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (C) Nos.2359-2360/2026, no further order is required. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 18-02-2026 vsi Page4 of 5 To Rep by its secretary to Government Revenue department Fort St. Goerge chennai 09

¶2The Special commissioner and commissioner of Land Administration Ezhilagam chepauk chennai 05

¶6The Tahsildar WPoNo.o6989oofo2022 S.M.SUBRAMANIAMeJ. AND C.KUMARAPPANeJ. vsi WPeNos.e6989e&e6993eofe2022 18-02-2026 Page5oofo5

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.